Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) has high incidence and low disease-specific mortality. However, active surveillance is not accepted by most patients owing to high physical or psychological pressures. The emergence of ablation technologies is supplanting traditional surgery. Our goal was to compare the clinical outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) and surgery for T1aN0M0 PTMC.

METHODS

A total of 92 consecutive patients with T1aN0M0 PTMC were studied retrospectively. Forty-six patients had been treated with MWA, and the other 46 had undergone surgery. MWA was performed using extensive ablation extending from the nodule's lower pole to the upper pole. Surgery was performed by total thyroidectomy or thyroid lobectomy. We compared the two groups in terms of mean length of stay, cost, mean blood loss, surgical incision, operating room (OR) time, quality of life (QOL) assessment, complications, and therapeutic efficacy over a follow-up period of 42 months.

RESULTS

The mean length of stay, cost, mean blood loss, surgical incisions, OR time, and complications in the MWA group were significantly lower than those of the surgery group. The QOL after MWA was higher than it was after surgery. The nodule volume decreased significantly from 53.61 ± 48.43 mm to 4.84 ± 6.55 mm (p < .001) at the 42-month follow-up, exhibiting a percentage volume reduction of 81.33 ± 36.87%. No recurrence or metastasis occurred in either group during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

MWA may be considered a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for solitary T1aN0M0 PTMC with low incidence of complications and good therapeutic effect.