• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受根治性手术的土耳其胃癌患者东西方生存列线图的比较

Comparison of East and West Survival Nomograms in Turkish Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Radical Surgery.

作者信息

Akgül Ö, Ocak S, Gündoğdu S B, Yalaza M, Güldoğan C E, Tez M

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

2 Department of Surgery, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Scand J Surg. 2018 Dec;107(4):308-314. doi: 10.1177/1457496918766724. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1177/1457496918766724
PMID:29637843
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

: The clinicopathological demonstrations of gastric cancer vary widely between Eastern and Western countries. Turkey is situated in Europe and Middle East which acts as a bridge between east and west. We aimed to validate the two popular nomograms of east and west origin by means of patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer in our country.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

: Of the 202 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer between the years 2006 and 2013, 145 of these patients whose data were sufficient were included in the study. For all patients, demographic, laboratory, operative, and pathologic findings were documented. For each patient, prognostic factors were incorporated into the nomograms for estimating 5-year survival probability.

RESULTS

: For a Turkish cohort, the western nomogram showed a better discriminative capacity (AUC = 0.721, 95% confidence interval 0.637-0.806) and was better calibrated (the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test p = 0.323), as compared to the eastern nomogram with AUC = 0.615, 95% confidence interval 0.522-0.708, and p = 0.077, respectively.

CONCLUSION

: Western nomogram was found to be more effective than eastern nomogram in prediction of estimating 5-year survival probability in patients with resectable gastric cancer in Turkish population.

摘要

背景与目的

东西方国家胃癌的临床病理表现差异很大。土耳其地处欧洲和中东之间,是东西方的桥梁。我们旨在通过我国接受胃癌根治性手术的患者来验证两种分别源自东西方的常用列线图。

材料与方法

在2006年至2013年间诊断为胃癌的202例患者中,有145例数据充足的患者被纳入研究。记录了所有患者的人口统计学、实验室、手术及病理检查结果。将每个患者的预后因素纳入列线图以估计5年生存概率。

结果

对于土耳其队列,西方列线图显示出更好的辨别能力(AUC = 0.721,95%置信区间0.637 - 0.806)且校准效果更好(Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验p = 0.323),相比之下,东方列线图的AUC = 0.615,95%置信区间0.522 - 0.708,p = 0.077。

结论

在预测土耳其可切除胃癌患者的5年生存概率方面,发现西方列线图比东方列线图更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of East and West Survival Nomograms in Turkish Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Radical Surgery.接受根治性手术的土耳其胃癌患者东西方生存列线图的比较
Scand J Surg. 2018 Dec;107(4):308-314. doi: 10.1177/1457496918766724. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
2
Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram.采用国际验证的列线图比较美国和韩国 R0 切除术后胃癌的生存情况。
Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):640-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d29b.
3
Nomograms for predicting survival in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who undergo palliative gastrectomy.预测接受姑息性胃切除术的转移性胃腺癌患者生存的列线图。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6075-5.
4
Nomograms predicting survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer who receive combination cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line treatment.预测接受一线联合细胞毒化疗的不可切除或转移性胃癌患者生存的列线图。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 May;21(3):453-463. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0756-z. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
5
Development and External Validation of a Simplified Nomogram Predicting Individual Survival After R0 Resection for Gastric Cancer: An International, Multicenter Study.发展和外部验证一种简化列线图预测胃癌 R0 切除术后个体生存:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(8):2383-2390. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6551-1. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Lymph nodes ratio based nomogram predicts survival of resectable gastric cancer regardless of the number of examined lymph nodes.基于淋巴结比率的列线图可预测可切除胃癌的生存率,无论检查的淋巴结数量如何。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):45585-45596. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17276.
7
Nomogram for 5-year relapse-free survival of a patient with advanced gastric cancer after surgery.术后进展期胃癌患者 5 年无复发生存率的列线图。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.080. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Nomogram to predict prolonged postoperative ileus after gastrectomy in gastric cancer.用于预测胃癌胃切除术后长时间术后肠梗阻的列线图。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct 14;25(38):5838-5849. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i38.5838.
9
Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer.用于预测胃癌行 d2 胃切除术患者长期生存的列线图
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 1;30(31):3834-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8343. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
Nomogram based on systemic inflammatory response markers predicting the survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy.基于全身炎症反应标志物的列线图预测可切除胃癌患者D2胃切除术后的生存情况。
Oncotarget. 2016 Jun 21;7(25):37556-37565. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8788.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative nutritional status as a predictor of postoperative overall survival in abdominal tumor surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.术前营养状况作为腹部肿瘤手术术后总生存的预测因素:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 18;12:1645392. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1645392. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the performance of the MSKCC gastric cancer survival calculator in the Turkish population.评估MSKCC胃癌生存计算器在土耳其人群中的性能。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 4;54(6):1205-1214. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5901. eCollection 2024.
3
Gastric cancer detection by non-blood-based liquid biopsies: A systematic review looking into the last decade of research.
基于非血液的液体活检技术用于胃癌检测:一项系统性综述,探究过去十年的研究进展。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Feb;11(1):114-130. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12328. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
4
Evaluation of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression, Clinicopathological Characteristics, and Factors Affecting Survival in Gastric Cancer.人表皮生长因子受体2过表达、临床病理特征及影响胃癌生存因素的评估
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021 Jul 2;55(2):224-231. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.23356. eCollection 2021.