Energy and Environmental Research Centre, Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
CSIRO Energy Flagship, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 11;15(4):723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040723.
There has been a massive increase in recent years of the use of lead (Pb) isotopes in attempts to better understand sources and pathways of Pb in the environment and in man or experimental animals. Unfortunately, there have been many cases where the quality of the isotopic data, especially that obtained by quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Q-ICP-MS), are questionable, resulting in questionable identification of potential sources, which, in turn, impacts study interpretation and conclusions. We present several cases where the isotopic data have compromised interpretation because of the use of only the major isotopes Pb/Pb and Pb/Pb, or their graphing in other combinations. We also present some examples comparing high precision data from thermal ionization (TIMS) or multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) to illustrate the deficiency in the Q-ICP-MS data. In addition, we present cases where Pb isotopic ratios measured on Q-ICP-MS are virtually impossible for terrestrial samples. We also evaluate the Pb isotopic data for rat studies, which had concluded that Pb isotopic fractionation occurs between different organs and suggest that this notion of biological fractionation of Pb as an explanation for isotopic differences is not valid. Overall, the brief review of these case studies shows that Q-ICP-MS as commonly practiced is not a suitable technique for precise and accurate Pb isotopic analysis in the environment and health fields.
近年来,人们越来越多地使用铅(Pb)同位素来更好地了解环境和人类或实验动物中 Pb 的来源和途径。不幸的是,在许多情况下,同位素数据的质量,特别是通过四极电感耦合等离子体质谱(Q-ICP-MS)获得的数据质量,是值得怀疑的,这导致了对潜在来源的可疑识别,而这反过来又影响了研究的解释和结论。我们提出了几个由于仅使用主要同位素 Pb/Pb 和 Pb/Pb 或其在其他组合中的绘图而导致同位素数据受到影响的解释的案例。我们还比较了热电离(TIMS)或多收集器等离子体质谱(MC-ICP-MS)的高精度数据,以说明 Q-ICP-MS 数据的不足。此外,我们还提出了在 Q-ICP-MS 上测量的 Pb 同位素比值对于陆地样品实际上是不可能的情况。我们还评估了大鼠研究的 Pb 同位素数据,该研究得出结论,Pb 同位素分馏发生在不同器官之间,并表明 Pb 的这种生物分馏概念作为同位素差异的解释是无效的。总体而言,这些案例研究的简要回顾表明,通常实践的 Q-ICP-MS 不是环境和健康领域中精确和准确的 Pb 同位素分析的合适技术。