• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚高效全科医疗服务机构将其成功归因于什么?应用临床微系统框架:一项定性研究。

What attributions do Australian high-performing general practices make for their success? Applying the clinical microsystems framework: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Dunham Annette H, Dunbar James A, Johnson Julie K, Fuller Jeff, Morgan Mark, Ford Dale

机构信息

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Deakin Rural Health School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e020552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020552.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020552
PMID:29643162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5898343/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the success attributions of high-performing Australian general practices and the enablers and barriers they envisage for practices wishing to emulate them.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and content analysis of the data. Responses were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded according to success characteristics of high-performing clinical microsystems.

SETTING

Primary healthcare with the participating general practices representing all Australian states and territories, and representing metropolitan and rural locations.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two general practices identified as high performing via a number of success criteria. The 52 participants were 19 general practitioners, 18 practice managers and 15 practice nurses.

RESULTS

Participants most frequently attributed success to the interdependence of the team members, patient-focused care and leadership of the practice. They most often signalled practice leadership, team interdependence and staff focus as enablers that other organisations would need to emulate their success. They most frequently identified barriers that might be encountered in the form of potential deficits or limitations in practice leadership, staff focus and mesosystem support.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice leaders need to empower their teams to take action through providing inclusive leadership that facilitates team interdependence. Mesosystem support for quality improvement in general practice should focus on enabling this leadership and team building, thereby ensuring improvement efforts are converted into effective healthcare provision.

摘要

目标

确定澳大利亚高效全科医疗服务机构的成功归因,以及它们认为希望效仿的机构在实现成功过程中的促进因素和障碍。

设计

采用半结构化访谈和数据内容分析的定性研究。根据高效临床微观系统的成功特征,对回答进行记录、逐字转录并编码。

背景

初级医疗保健领域,参与的全科医疗服务机构代表了澳大利亚所有州和领地,涵盖城市和农村地区。

参与者

通过多项成功标准确定的22家高效全科医疗服务机构。52名参与者包括19名全科医生、18名诊所经理和15名执业护士。

结果

参与者最常将成功归因于团队成员的相互依存、以患者为中心的护理以及诊所的领导力。他们最常指出诊所领导力、团队相互依存和员工关注是其他机构为效仿其成功所需的促进因素。他们最常确定可能遇到的障碍,表现为诊所领导力、员工关注和中观系统支持方面的潜在不足或限制。

结论

诊所领导者需要通过提供促进团队相互依存的包容性领导力,赋予团队采取行动的权力。中观系统对全科医疗服务质量改进的支持应侧重于促进这种领导力和团队建设,从而确保改进努力转化为有效的医疗服务提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5226/5898343/b630ca854221/bmjopen-2017-020552f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5226/5898343/141d5a3bf181/bmjopen-2017-020552f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5226/5898343/b630ca854221/bmjopen-2017-020552f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5226/5898343/141d5a3bf181/bmjopen-2017-020552f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5226/5898343/b630ca854221/bmjopen-2017-020552f02.jpg

相似文献

1
What attributions do Australian high-performing general practices make for their success? Applying the clinical microsystems framework: a qualitative study.澳大利亚高效全科医疗服务机构将其成功归因于什么?应用临床微系统框架:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e020552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020552.
2
Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医疗中基层医疗人员对区域数据质量干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 26;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0445-8.
3
Trial of the Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool: building organisational performance in Australian general practice and primary health care.初级保健实践改进工具试验:在澳大利亚全科医疗和初级卫生保健中构建组织绩效。
Med J Aust. 2016 Apr 18;204(7 Suppl):S15-21. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00121.
4
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
5
Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care.为澳大利亚初级医疗保健中的质量改进实施提供信息。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3099-5.
6
A framework for developing rural academic general practices: a qualitative case study in rural Victoria.发展农村学术性全科医疗的框架:维多利亚州农村地区的一项定性案例研究
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3072. Epub 2015 May 29.
7
Advancing general practice nursing in Australia: roles and responsibilities of primary healthcare organisations.推动澳大利亚全科护理发展:初级医疗保健组织的角色与职责
Aust Health Rev. 2017 May;41(2):127-132. doi: 10.1071/AH15239.
8
Patient Centred Medical Home (PCMH) transitions in western Sydney, Australia: a qualitative study.澳大利亚西悉尼的以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)转型:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05123-7.
9
From strategy to action: a qualitative study on salient factors influencing knowledge transfer in project-based experiential learning in healthcare organisations in Kenya.从策略到行动:肯尼亚基于项目的体验式学习在医疗保健组织中知识转移的显著影响因素的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e031100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031100.
10
Learning from the implementation of a quality improvement intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative analysis of participants views of a CVD preventive care project.从澳大利亚全科医疗中实施质量改进干预措施中学习:对 CVD 预防保健项目参与者观点的定性分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 14;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01692-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality improvement work in general practice; a Norwegian focus group study.全科医疗中的质量改进工作:挪威的焦点小组研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Dec;42(4):677-685. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2380920. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Implementing primary care diabetes prevention for women with previous gestational diabetes: a mixed-methods study.实施针对有既往妊娠糖尿病史女性的初级保健糖尿病预防计划:一项混合方法研究。
Fam Pract. 2022 Nov 22;39(6):1080-1086. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac022.
3
Findings and lessons learnt implementing a cardiovascular disease quality improvement program in Australian primary care: a mixed method evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hard Work of Health Care Transformation.医疗保健转型的艰巨工作。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):709-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1606458.
2
Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医疗中基层医疗人员对区域数据质量干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 26;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0445-8.
3
General practices' perspectives on Medicare Locals' performance are critical lessons for the success of Primary Health Networks.
在澳大利亚初级保健中实施心血管疾病质量改进计划的发现和经验教训:混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 26;22(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07310-6.
4
Quality improvement in a crisis: a qualitative study of experiences and lessons learned from the Irish National Ambulance Service response to the COVID-19 pandemic.危机中的质量改进:对爱尔兰国家救护服务应对 COVID-19 大流行的经验和教训的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e057162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057162.
5
An evaluation of the clinical microsystems approach in general practice quality improvement.评价临床微观系统方法在一般实践质量改进中的应用。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Jun 23;21:e21. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000158.
6
Relationship between general practice capitation funding and the quality of primary care in England: a cross-sectional, 3-year study.英国全科医疗按人头付费资金与初级医疗服务质量的关系:一项为期3年的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e030624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030624.
全科医疗对医疗保险地方机构绩效的看法是初级卫生保健网络成功的关键经验教训。
Australas Med J. 2015 Oct 31;8(10):320-4. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2508. eCollection 2015.
4
A systematic review of the challenges to implementation of the patient-centred medical home: lessons for Australia.系统评价以患者为中心的医疗之家实施面临的挑战:对澳大利亚的启示。
Med J Aust. 2014 Aug 4;201(3 Suppl):S69-73. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00295.
5
Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report.通过澳大利亚初级保健合作计划改善澳大利亚的初级保健:质量改进报告。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):948-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000165. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
6
Physician practices and readiness for medical home reforms: policy, pitfalls, and possibilities.医生的实践和准备情况对医疗之家改革:政策、陷阱和可能性。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):486-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01332.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
7
When big isn't beautiful: lessons from England and Scotland on primary health care organisations.大并不总是美的:英国和苏格兰初级卫生保健组织的经验教训。
Med J Aust. 2011 Aug 15;195(4):219-21. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03286.x.
8
Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands.通过捆绑支付整合医疗服务——来自荷兰的经验教训。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.
9
Are New Zealand's new primary health organisations fit for purpose?新西兰新的初级卫生保健组织是否符合目的?
BMJ. 2006 Dec 9;333(7580):1216-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39029.493542.94.
10
Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce.改善、信任与医疗劳动力。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):448-52. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.448.