• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚乳腺癌保乳手术后的再次手术:基于关联医院数据的全州队列研究

Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data.

作者信息

van Leeuwen Marina T, Falster Michael O, Vajdic Claire M, Crowe Philip J, Lujic Sanja, Klaes Elizabeth, Jorm Louisa, Sedrakyan Art

机构信息

Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e020858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020858.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020858
PMID:29643165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5898348/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate between-hospital variation in the probability of reoperation within 90 days of initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and the contribution of health system-level and other factors.

DESIGN

Population-based, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Linked administrative hospitalisation data were used to define a cohort of adult women undergoing initial BCS for breast cancer in NSW between 1 July 2002 and 31 December 2013.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Multilevel, cross-classified models with patients clustered within hospitals and residential areas were used to examine factors associated with any reoperation, and either re-excision or mastectomy, within 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 34 458 women undergoing BCS, 29.1% underwent reoperation within 90 days, half of which were mastectomies. Overall, the probability of reoperation decreased slightly over time. However, there were divergent patterns by reoperation type; the probability of re-excision increased alongside a concomitant decrease in the probability of mastectomy. Significant between-hospital variation was observed. Non-metropolitan location and surgery at low-volume hospitals were associated with a higher overall probability of reoperation, and of mastectomy specifically, after accounting for patient-level factors, calendar year and area-level socioeconomic status. The magnitude of association with geographical location and surgical volume decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation rates within 90 days of BCS varied significantly between hospitals. For women undergoing mastectomy after BCS, this represents a dramatic change in clinical course. Multilevel modelling suggests unwarranted clinical variation may be an issue, likely due to disparities in access to multidisciplinary breast cancer care and preoperative diagnostic procedures. However, the observed reduction in disparities over time is encouraging and indicates that guidelines and policy initiatives have the potential to improve regional breast cancer care.

摘要

目的

调查初次保乳手术(BCS)后90天内再次手术概率的医院间差异,以及卫生系统层面和其他因素的作用。

设计

基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

地点

澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)。

参与者

利用关联的行政住院数据定义了2002年7月1日至2013年12月31日在新南威尔士州因乳腺癌接受初次保乳手术的成年女性队列。

主要结局指标

采用患者在医院和居住地区内聚类的多水平交叉分类模型,研究90天内与任何再次手术以及再次切除或乳房切除术相关的因素。

结果

在34458名接受保乳手术的女性中,29.1%在90天内接受了再次手术,其中一半是乳房切除术。总体而言,再次手术的概率随时间略有下降。然而,不同再次手术类型呈现出不同模式;再次切除的概率增加,同时乳房切除术的概率相应下降。观察到显著的医院间差异。在考虑患者层面因素、日历年和地区层面社会经济地位后,非大都市地区以及在手术量低的医院进行手术与总体再次手术概率较高相关,尤其是与乳房切除术概率较高相关。与地理位置和手术量的关联程度随时间下降。

结论

保乳手术后90天内的再次手术率在医院间存在显著差异。对于保乳手术后接受乳房切除术的女性,这代表了临床病程的巨大变化。多水平建模表明不必要的临床差异可能是一个问题,可能是由于获得多学科乳腺癌护理和术前诊断程序存在差异。然而,观察到的差异随时间减少令人鼓舞,表明指南和政策举措有可能改善区域乳腺癌护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/121eb69b38ed/bmjopen-2017-020858f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/46fc3555c46f/bmjopen-2017-020858f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/de1db407e96d/bmjopen-2017-020858f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/121eb69b38ed/bmjopen-2017-020858f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/46fc3555c46f/bmjopen-2017-020858f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/de1db407e96d/bmjopen-2017-020858f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc45/5898348/121eb69b38ed/bmjopen-2017-020858f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data.澳大利亚乳腺癌保乳手术后的再次手术:基于关联医院数据的全州队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e020858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020858.
2
Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study.早期乳腺癌患者保乳手术后的再次切除与生存情况:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2882-7.
3
Association of Breast Conservation Surgery for Cancer With 90-Day Reoperation Rates in New York State.纽约州保乳手术治疗癌症与 90 天再次手术率的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jul 1;151(7):648-55. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5535.
4
Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.与原发性可手术乳腺癌的手术切缘累及、再次手术和残留癌相关的临床病理因素——对 2050 例患者的分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;44(11):1725-1735. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.056. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Contemporary Analysis of Reexcision and Conversion to Mastectomy Rates and Associated Healthcare Costs for Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术后再次切除术和改行乳房切除术的比率及相关医疗保健费用的当代分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3649-3660. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14902-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
Risk Factors for Re-Excision Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术后再次切除的危险因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 May 1;44(3):358-365. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.358-365.
7
The Influence of Hospital and Surgeon Factors on the Prevalence of Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.医院和外科医生因素对导管原位癌腋窝淋巴结评估流行率的影响。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):323-32. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0389.
8
Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort.保乳手术后再次切除的患者与未再次切除的患者在大型基于人群的队列中的总生存情况比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):282-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
Rates of re-excision and conversion to mastectomy after breast-conserving surgery with or without oncoplastic surgery: a nationwide population-based study.保乳手术后行或不行肿瘤整形术的再次切除术和改行乳房切除术的比率:一项全国基于人群的研究。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1762-1772. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11838. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Patterns of immediate breast reconstruction in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.澳大利亚新南威尔士州即刻乳房重建模式:一项基于人群的研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1230-1235. doi: 10.1111/ans.15381. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术中切缘阳性的临床病理预测因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3939-3947. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15153-8. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
2
Surgical and Radiology Trainees' Proficiency in Reading Mammograms: the Importance of Education for Cancer Localisation.外科和放射科医师阅读乳腺 X 线照片的能力:癌症定位教育的重要性。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Apr;39(2):186-193. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02393-7. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
3
Identification and classification of principal features for analyzing unwarranted clinical variation.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.初始乳腺癌保乳手术后再次手术的趋势:解决手术管理中的过度治疗问题。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1352-1357. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0774.
2
Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.导线引导下保乳手术后导管原位癌与浸润性乳腺癌的再次手术率
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):378-384. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4751.
3
Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis.
分析不适当临床变异的主要特征的识别和分类。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):251-259. doi: 10.1111/jep.13940. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
Prospective study: Impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging on oncoplastic surgery and on indications of mastectomy in patients who were previously candidates to breast conserving surgery.前瞻性研究:乳腺磁共振成像对肿瘤整形手术以及既往适合保乳手术患者乳房切除术指征的影响。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 16;13:1154680. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1154680. eCollection 2023.
5
Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline.在 SSO-ASTRO 切缘指南发布前后,西澳大利亚行保乳癌症手术后再次手术率。
Breast. 2023 Jun;69:499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Textual fiducial detection in breast conserving surgery for a near-real time image guidance system.用于近实时图像引导系统的保乳手术中的文本基准检测
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Feb;11315. doi: 10.1117/12.2550662. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
Tumor deformation correction for an image guidance system in breast conserving surgery.保乳手术中图像引导系统的肿瘤变形校正
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2022 Feb-Mar;12034. doi: 10.1117/12.2611570. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re-excision rates? A systematic review.洞缘削切术能否降低残余肿瘤及再次切除率?一项系统综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1295-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06512-5. Epub 2022 May 20.
9
Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.乳腺癌手术切缘导致再次手术的回顾性研究:4489 例患者的注册研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(4):577-588. doi: 10.1002/jso.26749. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
Validated prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery based exclusively on preoperative data.仅基于术前数据的保乳手术中切缘阳性的验证预测模型。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab092.
亚洲人群与白种人群乳腺X线密度的差异:一项对比分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(2):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4054-y. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.保乳手术尝试中的再次手术成本:一项决策分析。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):314-321. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2989. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
5
Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.外科医生手术量、患者年龄和肿瘤相关因素影响保乳手术后再次切除的必要性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):656-664. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5602-8. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
6
Reoperations after primary breast conserving surgery in women with invasive breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain: a retrospective study.西班牙加泰罗尼亚浸润性乳腺癌女性保乳手术后的再次手术:一项回顾性研究
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Apr;19(4):448-456. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1546-5. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.保乳手术后手术切缘的预测因素:一项基于大样本人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):627-633. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5532-5. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.外科肿瘤学会-美国放射肿瘤学会-美国临床肿瘤学会关于导管原位癌保乳手术联合全乳照射切缘的共识指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):4040-4046. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.保乳治疗的导管原位癌女性患者手术切缘与局部复发的相关性:一项荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;23(12):3811-3821. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5446-2. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Geographical disparity in breast reconstruction following mastectomy has reduced over time.随着时间的推移,乳房切除术后乳房重建的地理差异有所减少。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):E183-E187. doi: 10.1111/ans.13710. Epub 2016 Aug 4.