• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development, validation and application of computer-linked knowledge questionnaires in diabetes education.

作者信息

Meadows K A, Fromson B, Gillespie C, Brewer A, Carter C, Lockington T, Clark G, Wise P H

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1988 Jan;5(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb00943.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb00943.x
PMID:2964330
Abstract

Multiple choice questionnaires (MCQs) capable of being marked manually or by a newly developed optical mark reader, or by use of an inexpensive inter-active microcomputer system have been developed for the separate assessment of insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent patient knowledge. Forty-six insulin-related and non-insulin-related multiple choice questions covering six main areas of knowledge were constructed for inclusion into draft questionnaires. From the responses of a total of 180 completed questionnaires, piloted in 18 randomly selected clinics in 14 Regional Health Authorities in England, psychometric analysis was performed to determine reliability, discrimination coefficients, and facility indices. Seventy-three per cent of insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) and 92% of non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients (NIDDM) MCQ correct options had facility indices within the acceptable range of 30 to 90%. 82% IDDM and 93% NIDDM correct options had discrimination coefficients exceeding 0.2. Questionnaire reliability (internal consistency) using the Kudor-Richardson (KR20) formula was IDDM 0.87 and NIDDM 0.82. Evidence in support of the IDDM questionnaire's criterion validity was based on significant differences (p less than 0.05) identified between a number of knowledge area scores stratified according to HbA1 levels. Prescriptive correction for screen display and automatic hard copy feedback was designed for both incorrect and omitted question options, providing both educational (patient) and analytical (clinic) documentation. Both technical and psychometric properties of these knowledge assessment instruments should be acceptable for diabetic knowledge evaluation and instruction.

摘要

相似文献

1
Development, validation and application of computer-linked knowledge questionnaires in diabetes education.
Diabet Med. 1988 Jan;5(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb00943.x.
2
Effect of computer-based learning on diabetes knowledge and control.基于计算机的学习对糖尿病知识及控制的影响。
Diabetes Care. 1986 Sep-Oct;9(5):504-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.9.5.504.
3
Knowledge profile and control in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者的知识水平与控制情况
Diabet Med. 1988 May-Jun;5(4):381-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb01009.x.
4
Measurement of emotional adjustment in diabetic patients: validity and reliability of ATT39.糖尿病患者情绪调适的测量:ATT39的效度与信度
Diabetes Care. 1986 Sep-Oct;9(5):480-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.9.5.480.
5
Prevalence and clinical features of tuberculosis in Ethiopian diabetic patients.埃塞俄比亚糖尿病患者中结核病的患病率及临床特征
East Afr Med J. 1999 Jul;76(7):361-4.
6
The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility.糖尿病问题领域量表。对其临床效用的评估。
Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):760-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.760.
7
[Acceptance and subjective evaluation of intensive insulin therapy and an educational program by pregnant women with insulin dependent diabetes].
Przegl Lek. 1994;51(8):339-42.
8
Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.针对质量参数的三选项、四选项和五选项多项选择题测试之间的比较:一项随机研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep-Oct;48(5):571-575. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.190757.
9
Misunderstanding in the classification of diabetes mellitus. What's in a name?糖尿病分类中的误解。名称意味着什么?
West J Med. 1993 Jul;159(1):44-9.
10
Individual teaching as a first-step intervention for the education of diabetic subjects.个体化教学作为糖尿病患者教育的第一步干预措施。
Acta Diabetol Lat. 1989 Jul-Sep;26(3):225-35. doi: 10.1007/BF02581389.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk and prevention of type II diabetes: offspring's views.2型糖尿病的风险与预防:子代的观点
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):194-9.
2
Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation. Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team.糖尿病综合护理:临床、社会心理及经济评估。糖尿病综合护理评估团队。
BMJ. 1994 May 7;308(6938):1208-12.