Lockington T J, Farrant S, Meadows K A, Dowlatshahi D, Wise P H
Department of Endocrinology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Diabet Med. 1988 May-Jun;5(4):381-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb01009.x.
Knowledge about diabetes was assessed using a previously described interactive computer-based questionnaire in 79 patients with insulin-dependent (IDDM) and 72 with non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM) diabetes mellitus routinely attending a single diabetic clinic. Simple linear correlation of total knowledge score with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) showed no significant relationship for either IDDM (r = 0.12: p = 0.18) or NIDDM (r = 0.15: p = 0.1). However, quintile grouping of knowledge scores showed the mean HbA1c to be significantly higher in the lowest scoring NIDDM quintile (10.6 +/- 0.5: +/- SE) with respect to the pooled mean of all the higher scoring quintiles (9.0 +/- 0.3) (p = 0.027). Mean HbA1c (9.6 +/- 0.5) was also higher in the least knowledgeable IDDM quintile than any other quintile group (range 8.8-9.0) but this was not significant with respect to the pooled mean of higher scoring patients (p greater than 0.1). The mean age of the lowest scoring IDDM quintile group (60.5 +/- 13.9 years) was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) than higher scoring IDDM groups (mean age range 36.5-43.3 years) but age was not significantly related to HbA1c in IDDM subjects. IDDM showed greater knowledge of diabetes than NIDDM but ignorance in key areas was unacceptably high in both diabetic subtypes, indicating that regular knowledge assessment and educational reinforcement may be essential for good diabetic control as well as patient safety, particularly in older IDDM patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
通过一份先前描述的基于计算机的交互式问卷,对79例胰岛素依赖型(IDDM)糖尿病患者和72例非胰岛素依赖型(NIDDM)糖尿病患者的糖尿病知识进行了评估,这些患者均定期前往一家糖尿病诊所就诊。总知识得分与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的简单线性相关分析显示,无论是IDDM患者(r = 0.12,p = 0.18)还是NIDDM患者(r = 0.15,p = 0.1),两者均无显著关系。然而,将知识得分进行五分位数分组后发现,NIDDM得分最低的五分位数组的平均HbA1c(10.6±0.5,±标准误)显著高于所有得分较高的五分位数组合并后的平均值(9.0±0.3)(p = 0.027)。知识最匮乏的IDDM五分位数组的平均HbA1c(9.6±0.5)也高于其他任何五分位数组(范围为8.8 - 9.0),但与得分较高患者的合并平均值相比,差异不显著(p>0.1)。得分最低的IDDM五分位数组的平均年龄(60.5±13.9岁)显著高于得分较高的IDDM组(平均年龄范围为36.5 - 43.3岁)(p<0.01),但在IDDM患者中,年龄与HbA1c无显著相关性。IDDM患者对糖尿病的了解程度高于NIDDM患者,但在这两种糖尿病亚型中,关键领域的无知程度都高得令人无法接受,这表明定期进行知识评估和强化教育对于良好的糖尿病控制以及患者安全可能至关重要,尤其是在老年IDDM患者中。(摘要截短为250字)