Tan J, Wei X X, Zhang Q H, Zhou Y S
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing 100081, China.
Dental Technical Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Apr 18;50(2):314-317.
To observe the effects of a modified semi-fixed bridge to restore a missing posterior tooth for three years.
In the study, 38 cases with a posterior tooth missed were chosen as experiment group. The inclusion criteria for these cases required that one abutment tooth be defected, and another abutment intact. The missed posterior tooth was restored with a modified semi-fixed bridge in which a metal wing retainer was applied to the intact abutment tooth and a full crown retainer was applied to the defected abutment tooth, and the non-rigid connector linked to the metal wing retainer and the pontic, while the rigid connector linked to the full crown retainer and the pontic. And 42 cases with same abutment conditions were chosen as control group. These control patients were treated with classical rigidly-fixed partial dentures. The clinical effects regarding the bridge survival, abutment conditions, and etc. were observed by examination.
The average observation time for experiment group was 40.3 months (from 9 to 60 months). One case failed with loose crown retainer after 7 months' usage. Another failed case was the same performance after 20 months' wearing. The restorations were rebounded after the inner face of crowns was treated, and they were used normally. No loose abutment and retainer, no decayed abutment teeth were found, and the marginal adaptations between retainers and abutment teeth were good. The average observation time of control group was 44.7 months(from 22 to 50 months). No secondary decays and loose abutment teeth were detected and the marginal adaptation of the retainers was good.
This modified semi-fixed bridge has similar survival rate and clinical effects to restore a missing posterior tooth when compared with the traditional rigidly-fixed partial dentures. But the long-term observation is required.
观察改良式半固定桥修复后牙缺失三年的效果。
本研究选取38例后牙缺失患者作为实验组。这些病例的纳入标准要求一颗基牙有缺损,另一颗基牙完好。用改良式半固定桥修复缺失的后牙,其中在完好的基牙上应用金属翼板固位体,在缺损的基牙上应用全冠固位体,非刚性连接体连接金属翼板固位体和桥体,刚性连接体连接全冠固位体和桥体。选取42例相同基牙条件的患者作为对照组。这些对照患者采用传统的刚性固定局部义齿进行治疗。通过检查观察桥体存留情况、基牙状况等临床效果。
实验组平均观察时间为40.3个月(9至60个月)。1例患者使用7个月后全冠固位体松动失败。另1例失败病例在佩戴20个月后出现相同表现。对冠内面进行处理后修复体恢复正常使用。未发现基牙和固位体松动,基牙无龋坏,固位体与基牙之间的边缘适合性良好。对照组平均观察时间为44.7个月(22至50个月)。未检测到继发龋和基牙松动,固位体的边缘适合性良好。
与传统的刚性固定局部义齿相比,这种改良式半固定桥修复后牙缺失的存留率和临床效果相似。但仍需要长期观察。