Suppr超能文献

腹疝修补术中使用缝合和吻合器固定补片后的慢性疼痛是否存在差异?吻合器固定方法是否更快?一项随机对照试验。

Is there difference in chronic pain after Suture and Stapler fixation method of mesh in Ventral Hernia? Is stapler fixation method quicker? A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Shaukat Noureen, Jaleel Farhat, Jawaid Masood, Zulfiqar Imrana

机构信息

Dr. Noureen Shaukat, MBBS. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Dr. Farhat Jaleel, MBBS, FCPS. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb;34(1):175-178. doi: 10.12669/pjms.341.13904.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain occurs in 20-30% of patients after hernia surgery. As a consequence of this chronic pain, almost one third of patients have limitations in daily activities. Frequency and severity of this pain varies with different techniques of hernia repair. The objective of this study was to compare polypropylene suture and skin staples for securing mesh in uncomplicated ventral hernioplasty in terms of acute and chronic postoperative pain and to compare the time taken for mesh fixation between polypropylene sutures and skin stapler in ventral hernioplasty.

METHODS

This study was conducted in Surgery Department of Dow University Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus and included 53 patients from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, after taking informed consent. All patients were operated under general anesthesia by the same surgical team. Patients were randomized into two groups; in one group mesh fixed with 2/0 polypropylene suture while in other group mesh stapler was used. Time taken to apply mesh was noted in minutes from laying the mesh over anterior rectus sheath to completion of fixation by either method. The severity of post-operative pain was measured with VAS (1-10) after one week, one month and after one year after surgery. Data was analysed using SPSS version 17.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics and operative outcome were similar in the two groups and statistically non-significant in both. Early postoperative pain was more after suture fixation but it was not statistically significant. Mean ± SD pain score was after one week 3.47±2.7 after sutures while 2.91±1.88 after stapler. After four weeks, 0.40±0.49 after suture while 0.35±0.48 after stapler fixation. In both study groups 30-34% of the patients felt some pain in follow-up after one year. Severity of pain was 0.60±0.62 after suture while 1.65±1.94 after stapler fixation which is statistically significant as well (p<0.007). Mean operative time was 15.33±6.33 minutes for suture fixation while 1.56±0.41 minutes for fixation by staples, p-value < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The method of fixation does not appear to cause significant difference in early post-operative pain but chronic pain is more after stapler fixation of mesh. However, operative time was reduced significantly in staple fixation group as compared to suture fixation group.

摘要

背景与目的

20%-30%的患者在疝气手术后会出现慢性疼痛。由于这种慢性疼痛,近三分之一的患者日常活动受限。这种疼痛的频率和严重程度因不同的疝气修补技术而异。本研究的目的是比较聚丙烯缝线和皮肤吻合钉在单纯性腹疝修补术中固定补片时的急性和慢性术后疼痛情况,并比较腹疝修补术中聚丙烯缝线和皮肤吻合器固定补片所需的时间。

方法

本研究在道健康科学大学奥贾校区道大学医院外科进行,从2015年1月至2016年12月纳入53例患者,均获得知情同意。所有患者均由同一手术团队在全身麻醉下进行手术。患者被随机分为两组;一组用2/0聚丙烯缝线固定补片,另一组使用吻合器。记录从将补片铺在前直肌鞘上到通过任何一种方法完成固定所用的时间(以分钟计)。术后一周、一个月和一年后,用视觉模拟评分法(VAS,1-10分)测量术后疼痛的严重程度。使用SPSS 17版软件进行数据分析。

结果

两组患者的特征和手术结果相似,且在统计学上均无显著差异。缝线固定后早期术后疼痛更明显,但无统计学意义。缝线固定后一周的平均±标准差疼痛评分为3.47±2.7,吻合器固定后为2.91±1.88。四周后,缝线固定后为0.40±0.49,吻合器固定后为0.35±0.48。在两个研究组中,30%-34%的患者在术后一年的随访中感到有些疼痛。缝线固定后疼痛严重程度为0.60±0.62,吻合器固定后为1.65±1.94,这在统计学上也有显著差异(p<0.007)。缝线固定的平均手术时间为15.33±6.33分钟,吻合器固定为1.56±0.41分钟,p值<0.001。

结论

固定方法在术后早期疼痛方面似乎没有显著差异,但吻合器固定补片后慢性疼痛更明显。然而,与缝线固定组相比,吻合器固定组的手术时间显著缩短。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验