• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CIS(变化影响得分)——一种用于量化医学教育干预对专业表现相关性的新型结果测量工具。

CIS (change impact score) - a novel outcome measurement tool to quantify the relevance of medical education interventions on professional performance.

作者信息

Taatz L, Wenzel V, Peiseler G J

机构信息

Medical Department, OmniaMed Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Eur CME. 2017 Sep 18;6(1):1375377. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2017.1375377. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/21614083.2017.1375377
PMID:29644137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5843072/
Abstract

Outcome measurements play a key role in professional CME (Continuing Medical Education). While assessment of delegate satisfaction and knowledge transfer is a common standard, it appears desirable to address higher levels of evidence. However, measurement of competence and performance is considered complex, difficult and expensive. The CIS (Change Impact Score) is a novel instrument to predict the relevance of the educational intervention to the professional performance of the physician, based on a standardised on-site self-assessment.

摘要

结果测量在专业的继续医学教育(CME)中起着关键作用。虽然对学员满意度和知识转移的评估是一个常见标准,但似乎有必要采用更高水平的证据。然而,能力和表现的测量被认为是复杂、困难且昂贵的。改变影响评分(CIS)是一种新颖的工具,它基于标准化的现场自我评估来预测教育干预与医生专业表现的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/fd4c107d404e/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/08d1ce820fda/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/3c0c902136f7/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/a2f7d1849809/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/fd4c107d404e/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/08d1ce820fda/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/3c0c902136f7/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/a2f7d1849809/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1b4/5843072/fd4c107d404e/ZJEC_A_1375377_F0004_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
CIS (change impact score) - a novel outcome measurement tool to quantify the relevance of medical education interventions on professional performance.CIS(变化影响得分)——一种用于量化医学教育干预对专业表现相关性的新型结果测量工具。
J Eur CME. 2017 Sep 18;6(1):1375377. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2017.1375377. eCollection 2017.
2
Continuing medical education, professional development, and requirements for medical licensure: a white paper of the Conjoint Committee on Continuing Medical Education.继续医学教育、专业发展与医学执照要求:继续医学教育联合委员会白皮书
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Spring;28(2):95-8. doi: 10.1002/chp.164.
3
Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?正规继续医学教育的影响:会议、研讨会、查房及其他传统继续教育活动能否改变医生的行为或医疗保健结果?
JAMA. 1999 Sep 1;282(9):867-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.9.867.
4
Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies.改变医生的行为表现。对继续医学教育策略效果的系统评价。
JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700.
5
The Educational Impact of Web-Based, Faculty-Led Continuing Medical Education Programs in Type 2 Diabetes: A Survey Study to Analyze Changes in Knowledge, Competence, and Performance of Health Care Professionals.基于网络的、由教师主导的2型糖尿病继续医学教育项目的教育影响:一项分析医疗保健专业人员知识、能力和表现变化的调查研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Oct 14;8(4):e40520. doi: 10.2196/40520.
6
A continuing medical education lecture and workshop, physician behavior, and barriers to change.一场继续医学教育讲座与研讨会、医生行为以及变革障碍。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001 Spring;21(2):110-6. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340210208.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
The role of audience characteristics and external factors in continuing medical education and physician change: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.受众特征和外部因素在继续医学教育及医生转变中的作用:继续医学教育的有效性:美国胸科医师学会循证教育指南
Chest. 2009 Mar;135(3 Suppl):56S-61S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2519.
9
Continuing medical education effect on physician knowledge application and psychomotor skills: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.继续医学教育对医生知识应用和操作技能的影响:继续医学教育的有效性:美国胸科医师学会循证教育指南
Chest. 2009 Mar;135(3 Suppl):37S-41S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2516.
10
Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes.继续医学教育(CME)有效吗?一项关于教育活动对医生绩效或医疗保健结果影响的分析。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1998;28(1):21-39. doi: 10.2190/UA3R-JX9W-MHR5-RC81.

本文引用的文献

1
State of play of CME in Europe in 2015: Proceedings from the Eighth Annual European CME Forum.2015年欧洲继续医学教育的现状:第八届年度欧洲继续医学教育论坛会议记录
J Eur CME. 2016 Jun 10;5(1):32174. doi: 10.3402/jecme.v5.32174. eCollection 2016.
2
Cologne Consensus Conference: providers in accredited CME/CPD 11-12 September 2015, Cologne, Germany.科隆共识会议:2015年9月11日至12日在德国科隆举行的经认可的继续医学教育/持续专业发展活动的提供者会议
J Eur CME. 2016 Apr 5;5(1):31437. doi: 10.3402/jecme.v5.31437. eCollection 2016.
3
Setting CME standards in Europe: guiding principles for medical education.
在欧洲设定继续医学教育标准:医学教育的指导原则。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Nov;28(11):1861-71. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.738191. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
4
[The effectiveness of CME -- quality improvement through differentiated advanced medical education research].[继续医学教育的成效——通过差异化的高级医学教育研究实现质量提升]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(3):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.03.003.
5
Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities.取得预期成果并改善结果:在整个学习活动中整合规划与评估。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.20001.
6
Accreditation for learning and change: quality and improvement as the outcome.学习与变革的认证:以质量和改进为成果。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005 Summer;25(3):174-82. doi: 10.1002/chp.26.