Baadsgaard O, Fox D A, Cooper K D
Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Hospital, MI 48109.
J Immunol. 1988 Mar 15;140(6):1738-44.
In vivo exposure of human epidermis to UV abrogates the function of T6+DR+ Langerhans cells and induces the appearance of Ag-presenting T6-DR+ OKM5+ cells in the epidermis. Since UV exposure of murine skin results in Ts lymphocyte activation, we investigated the capacity of human epidermal cells (EC) harvested 3 days after in vivo UV exposure to activate regulatory and effector autologous T lymphocyte subsets. T lymphocytes were separated into CD8+ suppressor/cytotoxic lymphocytes and CD4+ helper/inducer lymphocytes by C lysis and panning. The CD4+ subset was further divided by using the 2H4 mAB to obtain CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes (inducers of TS lymphocytes) and CD4+2H4- lymphocytes (inducers of B cell Ig production and inducers of cytotoxic T cells). Unirradiated suction blister-derived EC from control skin (C-EC) and from skin exposed in vivo to UV (UV-EC) were cultured with purified autologous T lymphocyte subsets in the absence of added Ag. The resultant T lymphocyte proliferation was detected by [3H]thymidine uptake. UV-EC were highly effective in the stimulation of CD4+ lymphocytes, whereas C-EC were poor stimulators. The stimulator effect of UV-EC was abrogated after depletion of DR+ UV-EC. When CD4+ lymphocytes were fractionated, UV-EC consistently demonstrated enhanced ability to stimulate suppressor-inducer CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes relative to C-EC. Although less responsive than CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes, CD4+2H4- lymphocytes also demonstrated greater proliferation to UV-EC than to C-EC. Neither UV-EC nor C-EC were able to activate CD8+ lymphocytes devoid of CD4+ lymphocytes. However, after addition of rIL-2 at concentrations that allow binding only to the high affinity IL-2R on T lymphocytes, UV-EC induced vigorous proliferation of CD8+ lymphocytes, whereas C-EC induced only background levels of proliferation. C lysis of leukocytes resident within UV-EC resulted in 66 to 70% reduction of CD8+ lymphocyte proliferation. In conclusion, UV-EC may activate CD8+ lymphocytes by at least two pathways: (1) UV-EC activation of CD4+2H4+ lymphocytes may induce differentiation/proliferation of CD8+ suppressor cells and (2) UV-EC activation of CD4+ cells may induce IL-2 production, that, in combination with UV-induced epidermal leukocytes, stimulates CD8+ cells.
人体表皮在体内暴露于紫外线会消除T6 + DR +朗格汉斯细胞的功能,并诱导表皮中抗原呈递性T6 - DR + OKM5 +细胞的出现。由于鼠类皮肤暴露于紫外线会导致Ts淋巴细胞活化,我们研究了在体内紫外线暴露3天后收获的人表皮细胞(EC)激活调节性和效应性自体T淋巴细胞亚群的能力。通过C裂解和平板淘选将T淋巴细胞分离为CD8 +抑制/细胞毒性淋巴细胞和CD4 +辅助/诱导淋巴细胞。使用2H4单克隆抗体进一步划分CD4 +亚群,以获得CD4 + 2H4 +淋巴细胞(Ts淋巴细胞诱导剂)和CD4 + 2H4 -淋巴细胞(B细胞Ig产生诱导剂和细胞毒性T细胞诱导剂)。将来自对照皮肤(C - EC)和体内暴露于紫外线的皮肤(UV - EC)的未照射的吸引水疱来源的EC与纯化的自体T淋巴细胞亚群在不添加抗原的情况下进行培养。通过[3H]胸苷摄取检测所得的T淋巴细胞增殖。UV - EC在刺激CD4 +淋巴细胞方面非常有效,而C - EC则是较差的刺激物。DR + UV - EC耗尽后,UV - EC的刺激作用被消除。当对CD4 +淋巴细胞进行分级分离时,相对于C - EC,UV - EC始终表现出增强的刺激抑制诱导性CD4 + 2H4 +淋巴细胞的能力。尽管CD4 + 2H4 -淋巴细胞的反应性低于CD4 + 2H4 +淋巴细胞,但它们对UV - EC的增殖反应也比对C - EC的更大。UV - EC和C - EC都不能激活不含CD4 +淋巴细胞的CD8 +淋巴细胞。然而,在添加仅能与T淋巴细胞上的高亲和力IL - 2R结合的浓度的重组白细胞介素-2(rIL - 2)后,UV - EC诱导CD8 +淋巴细胞强烈增殖,而C - EC仅诱导背景水平的增殖。UV - EC中驻留的白细胞的C裂解导致CD8 +淋巴细胞增殖减少66%至70%。总之,UV - EC可能通过至少两条途径激活CD8 +淋巴细胞:(1)UV - EC对CD4 + 2H4 +淋巴细胞的激活可能诱导CD8 +抑制细胞的分化/增殖,以及(2)UV - EC对CD4 +细胞的激活可能诱导IL - 2的产生,IL - 2与紫外线诱导的表皮白细胞结合,刺激CD8 +细胞。