Suppr超能文献

鼻窦肿瘤术前与术后组织病理学的不一致性。

Discordance in Preoperative and Postoperative Histopathology of Sinonasal Tumors.

作者信息

Ganti Ashwin, Tajudeen Bobby A, Plitt Max A, Rossi Isolina, Gattuso Paolo, Batra Pete S

机构信息

1 Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.

2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Center for Skull Base Pituitary Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 Mar;32(2):101-105. doi: 10.1177/1945892418762845.

Abstract

Background Head and neck surgical pathology has been shown to be prone to histopathologic diagnostic error that can adversely impact patient care due to inappropriate management. Sinonasal tumors, in particular, present a diagnostic challenge given the relative rarity and diversity in histology and thus may have higher rates of discordant histology. Objective The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of discrepancy between preoperative and postoperative diagnoses of sinonasal tumors. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed on 52 patients treated for sinonasal tumors between January 2013 and December 2016. Initial diagnosis on preoperative biopsy was compared to postoperative diagnosis rendered at a single tertiary care referral center. A discrepant diagnosis was regarded as any change in diagnosis that resulted in further refinement of therapy or prognosis. Results Eleven (21.2%) patients had discrepancy between the preliminary pathology and postsurgical diagnosis. Of these diagnoses, four involved a change from a benign to a more aggressive benign or malignant process, three involved reclassification of a malignant tumor to a more aggressive histology, and four involved change from an aggressive process to benign histology. In all 11 cases, alteration in management strategy was rendered. The majority of discordant diagnoses were of fibro-osseous lesions and small round blue cell tumors. Conclusion Sinonasal tumors exhibit a high degree of discordance from preoperative to postoperative diagnosis. Critical decision-making should be reserved until careful review of operative specimens is performed to minimize patient morbidity and unnecessary interventions.

摘要

背景

头颈外科病理学已被证明容易出现组织病理学诊断错误,由于管理不当,这可能会对患者护理产生不利影响。特别是鼻窦肿瘤,鉴于其组织学相对罕见且多样,提出了诊断挑战,因此可能具有更高的组织学不一致率。目的:本研究的目的是确定鼻窦肿瘤术前和术后诊断之间的差异率。方法:对2013年1月至2016年12月期间接受鼻窦肿瘤治疗的52例患者进行回顾性病历审查。将术前活检的初步诊断与在单一三级医疗转诊中心做出的术后诊断进行比较。差异诊断被视为任何导致治疗或预后进一步细化的诊断变化。结果:11例(21.2%)患者的初步病理诊断与术后诊断存在差异。在这些诊断中,4例涉及从良性到更具侵袭性的良性或恶性过程的转变,3例涉及将恶性肿瘤重新分类为更具侵袭性的组织学,4例涉及从侵袭性过程转变为良性组织学。在所有11例病例中,均改变了管理策略。大多数不一致的诊断是纤维骨性病变和小圆形蓝细胞肿瘤。结论:鼻窦肿瘤术前至术后诊断存在高度不一致。在仔细检查手术标本之前,应保留关键决策,以尽量减少患者的发病率和不必要的干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验