Suppr超能文献

养护条件对 MTA 物理化学性能的影响。

Effect of curing conditions on physical and chemical properties of MTA.

机构信息

Department of Endodontology, Dental School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2018 Nov;51(11):1279-1291. doi: 10.1111/iej.12938. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate setting time, pH, solubility and surface roughness of MTA+ and ProRoot MTA and characterize their hydration under several curing conditions.

METHODOLOGY

Specimens were prepared to evaluate setting time (n = 6 for each group, specimen dimensions 10 × 8 × 5 mm), solubility (n = 6 for each group, specimen dimension 20 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm thick) after 1 and 28 days, pH (n = 10 for each group, specimen dimensions 10 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) after 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days and surface roughness (n = 10 for each group, specimen dimensions 4 mm in diameter and 3 mm high) after 28 days when cements were cured at 95% humidity or immersed in saline or HBSS at 37 °C. The powder and liquid were mechanically mixed by an amalgamator. The set materials were characterized using X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy-dispersive analysis. Statistical comparisons were employed using one-way anova. The level of significance was set at P = 0.05.

RESULTS

Setting time was significantly shorter when cements were cured at 95% humidity compared to those in saline (P < 0.001) and HBSS (P < 0.001). Setting time of MTA+ was significantly shorter than that of ProRoot MTA (P < 0.001), which had a significantly higher pH than MTA+ (P < 0.05) for all periods and immersion liquids. After immersion in saline, MTA+ was significantly less soluble than ProRoot MTA (P < 0.001); when immersed in HBSS, no significant difference was found (P = 1.00). The surface roughness of both cements was affected when exposed to HBSS (P < 0.001 for both cements) and saline (P < 0.001 for both cements). Storage in HBSS created a homogenous surface; incubation in saline or humidity created a biphasic surface. The main crystalline phases in both cements were tricalcium silicate, bismuth oxide and calcium hydroxide.

CONCLUSIONS

MTA+ had a shorter setting time than ProRoot MTA, promoted lower pH and had lower solubility in saline. Curing conditions affected the surface roughness and microstructure of the cements.

摘要

目的

评估 MTA+和 ProRoot MTA 的凝固时间、pH 值、溶解度和表面粗糙度,并在几种固化条件下对其水化作用进行表征。

方法

分别对每组各 6 个样本(试件尺寸 10×8×5mm)进行凝固时间评估,每组各 6 个样本(试件直径 20mm,厚度 1.5mm)进行 1 天和 28 天后的溶解度评估,每组各 10 个样本(试件直径 10mm,厚度 1mm)进行 1、7、14、21 和 28 天后的 pH 值评估,每组各 10 个样本(试件直径 4mm,高度 3mm)进行 28 天后的表面粗糙度评估,当水泥在 95%湿度下固化或在 37°C 下浸泡在盐水中或 HBSS 中时。粉末和液体通过混合器机械混合。使用 X 射线衍射分析、扫描电子显微镜和 X 射线能量色散分析对凝固材料进行了特征描述。采用单向方差分析进行统计学比较。显著性水平设定为 P=0.05。

结果

与在盐水中(P<0.001)和 HBSS 中(P<0.001)相比,水泥在 95%湿度下固化时凝固时间明显缩短。MTA+的凝固时间明显短于 ProRoot MTA(P<0.001),且在所有时期和浸泡液中,MTA+的 pH 值均明显高于 ProRoot MTA(P<0.05)。在盐水中浸泡后,MTA+的溶解度明显低于 ProRoot MTA(P<0.001);在 HBSS 中浸泡时,未发现明显差异(P=1.00)。暴露于 HBSS 时,两种水泥的表面粗糙度均受到影响(两种水泥均 P<0.001);暴露于盐水中时,表面粗糙度也受到影响(两种水泥均 P<0.001)。在 HBSS 中储存会产生均匀的表面;在盐水中或湿度中孵育会产生双相表面。两种水泥的主要晶体相均为硅酸三钙、氧化铋和氢氧化钙。

结论

MTA+的凝固时间短于 ProRoot MTA,在盐水中 pH 值较低,溶解度较低。固化条件会影响水泥的表面粗糙度和微观结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验