Fordham University at Lincoln Center.
Am Psychol. 2018 Apr;73(3):288-289. doi: 10.1037/amp0000320.
In this reply to Young and Collins (2018), the author responds to 3 primary concerns raised about integrating psychobiography into mainstream psychology: appropriate historical context and historiographic research methods, avoiding deterministic conclusions and the role of psychobiography in theory testing, and ethical concerns related to lack of informed consent of the identified subject. The author appreciates the thoughtful comments of Young and Collins and hopes that discussion and debate about psychobiography will continue in the literature. (PsycINFO Database Record
在对 Young 和 Collins(2018)的回复中,作者回应了将心理传记整合到主流心理学中所引发的 3 个主要关注:适当的历史背景和历史研究方法、避免决定论结论和心理传记在理论检验中的作用,以及与被确认主体缺乏知情同意相关的伦理问题。作者感谢 Young 和 Collins 的深思熟虑的评论,并希望关于心理传记的讨论和争论能在文献中继续下去。