Suppr超能文献

跨专业学习准备度量表(RIPLS)的评估:项目反应理论分析

Assessment of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS): An item response theory analysis.

作者信息

Kerry Matthew James, Wang Rongmei, Bai Jinbing

机构信息

a Department of Management, Technology, & Economics , ETH , Zurich , Switzerland.

b School of Nursing , Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin , China.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):634-637. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1459515. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

Abstract

This short report aims to bring evidence from modern psychometric methods to bear on a popularly deployed questionnaire in interprofessional education (IPE) assessment. Specifically, three interrelated problems raised against the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) are examined in a study with 280 medical and nursing student participants. Firstly, findings support RIPLS overall reliability, but fail to support subscale reliabilities. Secondly, findings indicate a strong, general factor underlying the RIPLS that supports unidimensional interpretations. Thirdly, findings support the RIPLS potential sensitivity to changes with appropriate lower ranges for our pre-training student sample. Recommendations for refinement to the RIPLS include: use of more appropriate reliability indices; factor generalizability; and a subset of items. More generally, refinement is possible, whereas RIPLS disuse or continued misuse with problematic scales is likely to hinder progress in the field of IPE.

摘要

本简短报告旨在运用现代心理测量方法的证据,来考量一份在跨专业教育(IPE)评估中广泛使用的问卷。具体而言,在一项有280名医学和护理专业学生参与的研究中,对针对跨专业学习准备量表(RIPLS)提出的三个相互关联的问题进行了考察。首先,研究结果支持RIPLS的整体信度,但不支持各子量表的信度。其次,研究结果表明RIPLS背后存在一个强大的一般因素,支持单维解释。第三,研究结果支持RIPLS对变化具有潜在敏感性,对于我们的预培训学生样本而言,其下限范围是合适的。对RIPLS进行改进的建议包括:使用更合适的信度指标;因素可推广性;以及项目子集。更普遍地说,改进是可行的,而废弃RIPLS或继续滥用存在问题的量表可能会阻碍IPE领域的进展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验