Suppr超能文献

瑞士学术医院创伤性脑损伤后植物状态水平低。

Low Level of Vegetative State After Traumatic Brain Injury in a Swiss Academic Hospital.

机构信息

From the Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2018 Sep;127(3):698-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003375.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No standards exist regarding decision making for comatose patients, especially concerning life-saving treatments. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to analyze outcomes and the decision-making process at the end of life (EOL) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a Swiss academic tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

Consecutive admissions to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with stays of at least 48 hours between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2015 in patients with moderate to severe TBI and with fatality within 6 months after trauma were included. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Of 994 ICU admissions with TBI in the study period, 182 had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale <13 and a length of stay in the ICU >48 hours. For 174 of them, a 6-month outcome assessment based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was available: 43.1% (36.0%-50.5%) had favorable outcomes (GOS 4 or 5), 28.7% (22.5%-35.9%) a severe disability (GOS 3), 0.6% (0%-3.2%) a vegetative state (GOS 2), and 27.6% (21.5%-34.7%) died (GOS 1). Among the GOS 1 individuals, 45 patients had a complete dataset (73% men; median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 43-79 years). Life-prolonging therapies were limited in 95.6% (85.2%-99.2%) of the cases after interdisciplinary prognostication and involvement of the surrogate decision maker (SDM) to respect the patient's documented or presumed will. In 97.7% (87.9%-99.9%) of the cases, a next of kin was the SDM and was involved in the EOL decision and process in 100% (96.3%-100.0%) of the cases. Written advance directives (ADs) were available for 14.0% (6.6%-27.3%) of the patients, and 34.9% (22.4%-49.8%) of the patients had shared their EOL will with relatives before trauma. In the other cases, each patient's presumed will was acknowledged after a meeting with the SDM and was binding for the EOL decision.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, the majority of deaths after TBI follow a decision to limit life-prolonging therapies. The frequency of patients in vegetative state 6 months after TBI is lower than expected; this could be due to the high prevalence of limitation of life-prolonging therapies. EOL decision making follows a standardized process, based on patients' will documented in the ADs or on preferences assumed by the SDM. The prevalence of ADs was low and should be encouraged.

摘要

背景

目前对于昏迷患者的决策尚无标准,尤其是在涉及救命治疗方面。本回顾性单中心研究旨在分析瑞士一家学术性三级护理医院创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在生命末期(EOL)的结局和决策过程。

方法

纳入 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日期间入住外科重症监护病房(ICU)且入住 ICU 至少 48 小时且创伤后 6 个月内死亡的中重度 TBI 患者。采用描述性统计方法。

结果

研究期间,994 例 TBI 患者中有 182 例初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)<13 分,且 ICU 入住时间>48 小时。其中 174 例基于格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)进行了 6 个月的预后评估:43.1%(36.0%-50.5%)预后良好(GOS 4 或 5),28.7%(22.5%-35.9%)为重度残疾(GOS 3),0.6%(0%-3.2%)为植物状态(GOS 2),27.6%(21.5%-34.7%)死亡(GOS 1)。在 GOS 1 患者中,45 例患者有完整数据集(73%为男性;中位年龄为 67 岁;四分位距为 43-79 岁)。在多学科预后评估后,限制生命延长治疗的患者占 95.6%(85.2%-99.2%),并涉及替代决策人(SDM)以尊重患者有记录或假定的意愿。在 97.7%(87.9%-99.9%)的情况下,近亲属为 SDM,在 100%(96.3%-100.0%)的情况下参与 EOL 决策和过程。14.0%(6.6%-27.3%)的患者有书面预嘱(AD),34.9%(22.4%-49.8%)的患者在创伤前与亲属分享过 EOL 意愿。在其他情况下,每个患者的假定意愿都在与 SDM 会面后得到确认,并对 EOL 决策具有约束力。

结论

在我们的机构中,TBI 后大多数死亡都遵循限制生命延长治疗的决策。6 个月后 TBI 患者处于植物状态的频率低于预期;这可能是由于限制生命延长治疗的频率较高。EOL 决策遵循基于患者 AD 中记录的意愿或 SDM 假定的偏好的标准化流程。AD 的流行率较低,应予以鼓励。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验