Willems Laurent M, Richter Saskia, Watermann Nina, Bauer Sebastian, Klein Karl Martin, Reese Jens-Peter, Schöffski Oliver, Hamer Hajo M, Knake Susanne, Rosenow Felix, Strzelczyk Adam
Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Epilepsy Center Hessen, Department of Neurology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jun;83:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
This study evaluated trends in resource use and prescription patterns in patients with active epilepsy over a 10-year period at the same outpatient clinic of a German epilepsy center. We analyzed a cross-sectional patient sample of consecutive adults with active epilepsy over a 3-month period in 2013 and compared them with equally acquired data from the years 2003 and 2008. Using validated patient questionnaires, data on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, as well as direct and indirect costs were recorded. A total of 198 patients (mean age: 39.6±15.0years, 49.5% male) were enrolled and compared with our previous assessments in 2003 (n=101) and 2008 (n=151). In the 2013 cohort, 75.8% of the patients had focal epilepsy, and the majority were taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (39.9% monotherapy, 59.1% polytherapy). We calculated epilepsy-specific costs of €3674 per three months per patient. Direct medical costs were mainly due to anticonvulsants (20.9% of total direct costs) and to hospitalization (20.8% of total direct costs). The proportion of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants and 'old' AEDs decreased between 2003 and 2013. Indirect costs of €1795 in 2013 were mainly due to early retirement (55.0% of total indirect costs), unemployment (26.5%), and days off due to seizures (18.2%). In contrast to our previous findings from 2003 and 2008, our data show a stagnating cost increase with slightly reduced total costs and balanced direct and indirect costs in patients with active epilepsy. These findings are accompanied by an ongoing cost-neutral increase in the prescription of 'newer' and non-enzyme-inducing AEDs. However, the number and distribution of indirect cost components remained unchanged.
本研究评估了德国一家癫痫中心同一门诊在10年期间活动性癫痫患者的资源使用趋势和处方模式。我们分析了2013年连续3个月期间患有活动性癫痫的成年患者的横断面样本,并将其与2003年和2008年同样获取的数据进行比较。使用经过验证的患者问卷,记录了社会经济状况、癫痫病程以及直接和间接成本的数据。共纳入198例患者(平均年龄:39.6±15.0岁,49.5%为男性),并与我们2003年(n = 101)和2008年(n = 151)的先前评估结果进行比较。在2013年的队列中,75.8%的患者患有局灶性癫痫,大多数患者正在服用抗癫痫药物(AEDs)(39.9%为单药治疗,59.1%为联合治疗)。我们计算出每位患者每三个月的癫痫特定成本为3674欧元。直接医疗成本主要归因于抗惊厥药物(占总直接成本的20.9%)和住院治疗(占总直接成本的20.8%)。2003年至2013年期间,酶诱导性抗惊厥药物和“老一代”AEDs的比例有所下降。2013年的间接成本为1795欧元,主要归因于提前退休(占总间接成本的55.0%)、失业(26.5%)以及因癫痫发作而请假(18.2%)。与我们2003年和2008年的先前研究结果相比,我们的数据显示,活动性癫痫患者的成本增长停滞,总成本略有下降,直接和间接成本达到平衡。这些结果伴随着“新一代”和非酶诱导性AEDs处方量持续的成本中性增长。然而,间接成本构成部分的数量和分布保持不变。