• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用专利系统进行微创经皮肾镜取石术吸引治疗鹿角形肾结石有效:一项前瞻性多中心研究

Suctioning Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a Patented System Is Effective to Treat Renal Staghorn Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

作者信息

Du Chuance, Song Leming, Wu Xiaoyuan, Fan Difu, Zhu Lunfeng, Liu Shengfeng, Deng Xiaolin, Liu Tairong, Yang Zhongsheng, Peng Zuofeng, Hu Min, Liu Qigui, Pan Tiejun, Chen Zhiqiang, Ye Zhangqun

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Ganzhou, China.

Department of Urology, Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Region, Kunming, China.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2018;101(2):143-149. doi: 10.1159/000488399. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1159/000488399
PMID:29649833
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, efficacy, and practicability of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) with the aid of a patented irrigation clearance system in treating renal staghorn calculi.

METHODS

From August 2009 to July 2014, 4 hospitals had executed a prospective multicenter study with a total of 912 cases. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: suctioning MPCNL, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and traditional MPCNL groups. Multiple operative and perioperative parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Blood loss and intrapelvic pressure in the suctioning MPCNL group were significantly less than those in the standard PCNL group. The average operation time, intrapelvic pressure, and amount of bleeding in the suctioning MPCNL group were better than those in the traditional MPCNL group. The suctioning MPCNL used one tract more frequently and 2 or 3 tracts less frequently than the standard MPCNL and traditional MPCNL groups. The stone-free rate by one surgery in the suctioning MPCNL group was significantly higher than that in standard PCNL and traditional MPNCL groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Suctioning MPCNL using our patented system shows several advantages in treating renal staghorn calculi, including minimal invasion, shorter operation time, lower intrapelvic pressure, less bleeding and the need for a smaller number of -percutaneous tracts, and higher stone clearance rate by one -surgery.

摘要

目的

探讨借助专利冲洗清除系统的微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗肾铸形结石的安全性、有效性和实用性。

方法

2009年8月至2014年7月,4家医院开展了一项前瞻性多中心研究,共纳入912例患者。患者被随机分为3组:吸引式MPCNL组、标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)组和传统MPCNL组。比较了多项手术及围手术期参数。

结果

吸引式MPCNL组的失血量和肾盂内压力显著低于标准PCNL组。吸引式MPCNL组的平均手术时间、肾盂内压力和出血量均优于传统MPCNL组。与标准MPCNL组和传统MPCNL组相比,吸引式MPCNL组更频繁地使用单通道,较少使用2或3通道。吸引式MPCNL组一次手术的结石清除率显著高于标准PCNL组和传统MPNCL组。

结论

使用我们的专利系统的吸引式MPCNL在治疗肾铸形结石方面显示出若干优势,包括侵袭性最小、手术时间短、肾盂内压力低、出血少、经皮通道数量少以及一次手术的结石清除率高。

相似文献

1
Suctioning Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a Patented System Is Effective to Treat Renal Staghorn Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Study.使用专利系统进行微创经皮肾镜取石术吸引治疗鹿角形肾结石有效:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Urol Int. 2018;101(2):143-149. doi: 10.1159/000488399. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Suctioning versus traditional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat renal staghorn calculi: A case-matched comparative study.超声引导经皮肾镜碎石取石术与传统微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:一项病例匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
The Comparison Study of Flexible Ureteroscopic Suctioning Lithotripsy With Intelligent Pressure Control Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Suctioning Nephrolithotomy in Treating Renal Calculi of 2 to 3 cm in Size.智能压力控制下的软性输尿管镜吸引碎石术与微创经皮肾镜吸引取石术治疗2至3厘米肾结石的对比研究
Surg Innov. 2019 Oct;26(5):528-535. doi: 10.1177/1553350619849782. Epub 2019 May 26.
4
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜下内镜联合肾内手术治疗部分鹿角形结石的随机对照试验
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
The New Generation Mini-PCNL System - Monitoring and Controlling of Renal Pelvic Pressure by Suctioning Device for Efficient and Safe PCNL in Managing Renal Staghorn Calculi.新一代迷你经皮肾镜取石术系统——通过抽吸装置监测和控制肾盂压力,以实现高效、安全地治疗肾铸形结石的经皮肾镜取石术。
Urol Int. 2016;97(1):61-6. doi: 10.1159/000442002. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with multiple mini tracts in a single session in treating staghorn calculi.一期多通道微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石
Urol Res. 2011 Apr;39(2):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0308-z. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
7
Combined Single-Tract of Minimally Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for Staghorn Calculi in Oblique Supine Lithotomy Position.斜仰卧截石位下经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜联合单通道治疗鹿角形结石
Surg Innov. 2018 Feb;25(1):22-27. doi: 10.1177/1553350617741023. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
A comparison of supracostal and infracostal access approaches in treating renal and upper ureteral stones using MPCNL with the aid of a patented system.使用专利系统辅助的微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗肾及上段输尿管结石时肋上与肋下入路方法的比较
BMC Urol. 2015 Oct 13;15:102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0097-3.
9
The application of a novel integrated rigid and flexible Nephroscope in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn stones.一种新型软硬一体式肾镜在经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性鹿角形肾结石中的应用。
BMC Urol. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0257-8.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of bilateral staghorn renal calculi in pediatric patients: 12 years experience in a tertiary care centre.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿双侧鹿角状肾结石:三级医疗中心 12 年经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):393-399. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0920-7. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in kidney stone management: mini-PCNL for staghorn calculi in resource-limited settings.肾结石治疗的创新:资源有限环境下用于鹿角形结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术
Front Urol. 2025 May 8;5:1555624. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2025.1555624. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of minimally invasive suction-evacuation versus standard nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of partial staghorn stones.微创抽吸排空术与标准肾造瘘鞘治疗部分鹿角形结石的比较
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 24;53(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01807-z.
3
Vacuum-assisted renal sheath clears 1 cm of stone faster than non-suction sheath in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
在微创经皮肾镜取石术中,真空辅助肾鞘清除1厘米结石的速度比非抽吸鞘更快。
World J Urol. 2025 May 8;43(1):284. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05629-x.
4
Comparison on Surgical Outcomes of Mini-Versus Standard-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Staghorn Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.鹿角形结石微创与标准经皮肾镜取石术手术效果的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Mar 7;50(5):281-290. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.24125.
5
International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy.国际尿石症联盟(IAU)关于微创经皮肾镜取石术的共识。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Oct 28;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00562-3.
6
Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中抽吸辅助肾造瘘通道鞘的有效性和安全性评估及肾内压力评估:文献系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):2558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092558.
7
A randomized controlled trial comparing infectious complications using mini perc with and without suction for renal stones less than 3 cm in size.一项比较 mini perc 联合与不联合吸引在肾结石大小小于 3cm 时应用导致感染并发症的随机对照试验。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Nov 22;52(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01487-7.
8
Miniaturization in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What is new?经皮肾镜取石术的小型化:有哪些新进展?
Asian J Urol. 2023 Jul;10(3):275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术术后疗效比较的Meta 分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01349-8. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术中真空辅助鞘与普通鞘的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00925-1.