• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床检查与社会风险人群:检查对健康差异至关重要。

The Clinical Examination and Socially At-Risk Populations: The Examination Matters for Health Disparities.

作者信息

Murphy Karly A, Ellison-Barnes Alejandra, Johnson Erica N, Cooper Lisa A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-500, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Osler Medical Residency Training Program, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;102(3):521-532. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.013
PMID:29650073
Abstract

Data from the United States show that persons from low socioeconomic backgrounds, those who are socially isolated, belong to racial or ethnic minority groups, or identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender experience health disparities at a higher rate. Clinicians must transition from a biomedical to a biopsychosocial framework within the clinical examination to better address social determinants of health that contribute to health disparities. We review the characteristics of successful patient-clinician interactions. We describe strategies for relationship-centered care within routine encounters. Our goal is to train clinicians to mitigate differences and reduce disparities in health care delivery.

摘要

来自美国的数据表明,社会经济背景较低、社会孤立、属于种族或少数族裔群体,或自我认同为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋或跨性别者的人,健康差距发生率更高。临床医生必须在临床检查中从生物医学框架转变为生物心理社会框架,以更好地解决导致健康差距的健康社会决定因素。我们回顾了成功的医患互动的特点。我们描述了在常规诊疗过程中以关系为中心的护理策略。我们的目标是培训临床医生减少医疗服务中的差异并缩小差距。

相似文献

1
The Clinical Examination and Socially At-Risk Populations: The Examination Matters for Health Disparities.临床检查与社会风险人群:检查对健康差异至关重要。
Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;102(3):521-532. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.013.
2
A Portfolio Analysis of Culturally Tailored Trials to Address Health and Healthcare Disparities.文化定制试验的组合分析,以解决健康和医疗保健方面的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;15(9):1859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091859.
3
How cultural competency can help reduce health disparities.文化能力如何有助于减少健康差距。
Radiol Technol. 2012 Nov-Dec;84(2):129-47; quiz 148-52.
4
Emergency medical practice: advancing cultural competence and reducing health care disparities.急诊医疗实践:提升文化能力与减少医疗保健差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;16(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00305.x. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
5
Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care.为何国家需要推动以患者为中心的医疗保健政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1489-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888.
6
Cultural Competency Matters: Calling for a Deeper Understanding of Healthcare Disparities Among Nurse Leaders.文化能力至关重要:呼吁护士领导者更深入地理解医疗保健差异
J Nurs Adm. 2018 Oct;48(10):474-477. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000654.
7
Medical professionalism requires that the best interest of the patient must always come first: yes.医学专业精神要求患者的最大利益必须始终放在首位:没错。
J Prim Health Care. 2013 Mar 1;5(1):74-5.
8
Primary Care Providers Perceptions of Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hypertension Control.基层医疗服务提供者对高血压控制方面种族/民族及社会经济差异的看法。
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Sep;28(9):1091-7. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu294. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
9
A framework for cultural competence in health care organizations.医疗保健机构文化能力框架。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2011 Jul-Sep;30(3):205-14. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318225dfe6.
10
Setting a National Agenda for Surgical Disparities Research: Recommendations From the National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons Summit.设定国家手术差异研究议程:来自美国国立卫生研究院和美国外科医师学会峰会的建议。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):554-63. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0014.

引用本文的文献

1
Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review.卫生专业人员对社会经济地位较低的患者的隐性偏见及其对临床决策的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 2;14(7):e081723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723.
2
The Impact of Foreign Trade on Health Inequality in China: Evidence From China Family Panel Studies (CFPS).对外贸易对中国健康不平等的影响:来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的证据。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;67:1605117. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605117. eCollection 2022.
3
Cultural Competence and Humility in Infectious Diseases Clinical Practice and Research.
传染病临床实践和研究中的文化能力与谦逊。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 14;222(Suppl 6):S535-S542. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa227.
4
COVID-19, racism, and the pursuit of health care and research worthy of trust.2019冠状病毒病、种族主义以及对值得信赖的医疗保健和研究的追求。
J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct 1;130(10):5033-5035. doi: 10.1172/JCI141562.
5
Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action.减少健康方面的种族不平等:利用我们已经知道的知识采取行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 19;16(4):606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040606.