• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin.

作者信息

Stille W, Sietzen W, Dieterich H A, Fell J J

机构信息

J.W. Goethe University, Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Frankfurt, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jan;21 Suppl A:69-79. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.69.

DOI:10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.69
PMID:2965134
Abstract

This was an open efficacy and safety study in 310 hospitalized patients (187 male and 123 female) with infection by Gram-positive bacteria. The age range was 12-88 years (mean 49.8 years), and 80 of the patients were older than 65 years. Teicoplanin was given either by fast iv or by im injection, in most cases at a dose of 200 or 400 mg every 24 h with an initial dose of 400 mg. For both routes of administration the mean total daily dose was 286 +/- 5 mg/day. The mean duration of treatment was 8.2 days (range 1-37 days). The infections comprised 133 skin or soft tissue, 53 joint or bone, 40 urinary tract, 39 upper respiratory tract, 21 lower respiratory tract, nine septicaemia, four gastro-intestinal tract and 11 miscellaneous. All Gram-positive bacteria isolated were sensitive to teicoplanin. Teicoplanin was the sole antimicrobial agent given in 269 of the 310 patients. Clinical cure occurred in 79.7%, and improvement in 13.6%. Adverse events related to teicoplanin occurred in 7.7% of the patients. Most were minor and in only six patients was treatment discontinued because of adverse events (three allergy, two bronchospasm, one tremor). The laboratory values and audiometry indices in 67 patients showed no significant changes. Teicoplanin was considered an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Gram-positive infections in this study.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jan;21 Suppl A:69-79. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.69.
2
Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections.
Infection. 1989 May-Jun;17(3):177-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01644026.
3
A multicentre open clinical trial of teicoplanin in infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.替考拉宁治疗革兰氏阳性菌感染的多中心开放性临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jan;21 Suppl A:61-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.61.
4
Teicoplanin in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections: results of a multicentre study.替考拉宁治疗皮肤及软组织感染:一项多中心研究结果
Infection. 1991 May-Jun;19(3):190-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01643252.
5
Treatment of infections by staphylococci and other gram-positive bacteria with teicoplanin: an open study.替考拉宁治疗葡萄球菌及其他革兰氏阳性菌感染的开放性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Sep;20(3):431-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/20.3.431.
6
Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin for therapy of severe infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.替考拉宁治疗革兰氏阳性菌所致严重感染的临床评价
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jan;29(1):52-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.1.52.
7
[Teicoplanin and Gram-positive coccus infections. Results of a multicenter study on 66 cases].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1987 May;35(5):511-5.
8
Teicoplanin in the treatment of infections by staphylococci, Clostridium difficile and other gram-positive bacteria.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Jan;23(1):131-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.1.131.
9
Treatment of bone and soft tissue infections with teicoplanin.替考拉宁治疗骨与软组织感染
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Mar;25(3):435-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.3.435.
10
Comparison of efficacy and safety of teicoplanin in gram-positive infections: a multicentre study.替考拉宁治疗革兰氏阳性菌感染的疗效与安全性比较:一项多中心研究。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;72:54-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Teicoplanin in peritoneal dialysis: efficacy, safety, and pharmacological considerations.替考拉宁在腹膜透析中的应用:疗效、安全性及药理学考量
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 May 15;86(8):4575-4578. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002171. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin and cephalosporins against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-intermediate Streptococcus pneumoniae.万古霉素、替考拉宁和头孢菌素对青霉素敏感及青霉素中介型肺炎链球菌的活性。
Can J Infect Dis. 1995 Mar;6(2):83-7. doi: 10.1155/1995/725654.
3
Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in hemodialysis patients.
替考拉宁在血液透析患者中的疗效及药代动力学
Infection. 1993 Jan-Feb;21(1):71-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01739321.
4
Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.单独使用替考拉宁或联合利福平与万古霉素相比,用于预防和治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的实验性异物感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Aug;38(8):1703-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.8.1703.
5
Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.替考拉宁:10年临床经验
Infection. 1994 Nov-Dec;22(6):430-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01715507.
6
Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman catheters.比较万古霉素与替考拉宁治疗希克曼导管相关感染的随机前瞻性研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1193-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1193.
7
Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections.
Infection. 1989 May-Jun;17(3):177-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01644026.
8
Teicoplanin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.替考拉宁:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力综述
Drugs. 1990 Sep;40(3):449-86. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040030-00007.
9
Teicoplanin in perspective. A critical comparison with vancomycin.
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1991 Aug 23;13(4):153-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01957739.
10
Treatment of severe sepsis in bone marrow transplant recipients with teicoplanin in combination with beta-lactams and aminoglycosides.
Infection. 1991 May-Jun;19(3):195-200. doi: 10.1007/BF01643253.