• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于统计学习的局限性:试验间情境线索仅限于时间上接近的偶发事件。

On the limits of statistical learning: Intertrial contextual cueing is confined to temporally close contingencies.

作者信息

Thomas Cyril, Didierjean André, Maquestiaux François, Goujon Annabelle

机构信息

Université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 30 Rue Mégevand, 25030, Besançon, France.

Laboratoire de Psychologie de l'Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1420-1435. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1519-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-018-1519-6
PMID:29651752
Abstract

Since the seminal study by Chun and Jiang (Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71, 1998), a large body of research based on the contextual-cueing paradigm has shown that the cognitive system is capable of extracting statistical contingencies from visual environments. Most of these studies have focused on how individuals learn regularities found within an intratrial temporal window: A context predicts the target position within a given trial. However, Ono, Jiang, and Kawahara (Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 703-712, 2005) provided evidence of an intertrial implicit-learning effect when a distractor configuration in preceding trials N - 1 predicted the target location in trials N. The aim of the present study was to gain further insight into this effect by examining whether it occurs when predictive relationships are impeded by interfering task-relevant noise (Experiments 2 and 3) or by a long delay (Experiments 1, 4, and 5). Our results replicated the intertrial contextual-cueing effect, which occurred in the condition of temporally close contingencies. However, there was no evidence of integration across long-range spatiotemporal contingencies, suggesting a temporal limitation of statistical learning.

摘要

自从Chun和Jiang的开创性研究(《认知心理学》,第36卷,第28 - 71页,1998年)以来,大量基于情境线索范式的研究表明,认知系统能够从视觉环境中提取统计偶发事件。这些研究大多集中在个体如何学习试验内时间窗口内发现的规律:一种情境在给定试验中预测目标位置。然而,Ono、Jiang和Kawahara(《实验心理学杂志》,第31卷,第703 - 712页,2005年)提供了证据,表明在前序试验N - 1中的干扰项配置预测试验N中的目标位置时,存在试验间内隐学习效应。本研究的目的是通过检验当预测关系受到与任务相关的干扰噪声(实验2和3)或长时间延迟(实验1、4和5)阻碍时该效应是否会出现,来进一步深入了解这种效应。我们的结果重复了试验间情境线索效应,该效应发生在时间上紧密偶发事件的条件下。然而,没有证据表明存在跨远距离时空偶发事件的整合,这表明统计学习存在时间限制。

相似文献

1
On the limits of statistical learning: Intertrial contextual cueing is confined to temporally close contingencies.关于统计学习的局限性:试验间情境线索仅限于时间上接近的偶发事件。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1420-1435. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1519-6.
2
Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies.语境线索在多连接视觉搜索中依赖于基于颜色和配置的试验间关联。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):515-32. doi: 10.1037/a0017448.
3
Object-based implicit learning in visual search: perceptual segmentation constrains contextual cueing.视觉搜索中基于对象的内隐学习:知觉分割对情境线索化的制约
J Vis. 2013 Jul 9;13(3):15. doi: 10.1167/13.3.15.
4
Statistical learning in the past modulates contextual cueing in the future.过去的统计学习会调节未来的情境线索效应。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 23;13(3):19. doi: 10.1167/13.3.19.
5
Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.在时空情境线索中,与任务相关的信息会被优先处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2397-2410. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1198-0.
6
Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention.语义语境线索与视觉注意力。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):50-71. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.50.
7
The impact of signal-to-noise ratio on contextual cueing in children and adults.信噪比对儿童和成人情境线索化的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;132:65-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
8
Stimulus homogeneity enhances implicit learning: evidence from contextual cueing.刺激同质性增强内隐学习:来自情境线索化的证据。
Vision Res. 2014 Apr;97:108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
9
Intertrial temporal contextual cuing: association across successive visual search trials guides spatial attention.试验间时间背景线索化:连续视觉搜索试验之间的关联引导空间注意力。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):703-712. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.703.
10
Predictive visual search: Role of environmental regularities in the learning of context cues.预测性视觉搜索:环境规律性在上下文线索学习中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jul;80(5):1096-1109. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1500-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Attending is not enough: Responding to targets is needed for across-trial statistical learning.仅出席是不够的:需要对目标做出反应以进行跨试验的统计学习。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):1963-1973. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02952-0. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
The visual statistical learning overcomes scene dissimilarity through an independent clustering process.视觉统计学习通过独立的聚类过程克服场景差异。
J Vis. 2024 Aug 1;24(8):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.8.5.
3
No evidence for spatial suppression due to across-trial distractor learning in visual search.
在视觉搜索中,没有因跨试分心物学习而产生空间抑制的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1088-1105. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02667-8. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
No exploitation of temporal sequence context during visual search.视觉搜索过程中未利用时间序列上下文。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 3;8(3):201565. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201565.