Suppr超能文献

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术管理中即时拔管与超快追踪策略的比较。

Comparison of immediate extubation versus ultrafast tracking strategy in the management of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

作者信息

Nagre Amarja Sachin, Jambures Nagesh P

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, MGM Medical College and MCRI, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Apr-Jun;21(2):129-133. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_135_17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ultrafast tracking of anesthesia (UFTA) is practiced routinely, whereas immediate on-table extubation after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting surgery has many concerns. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of immediate extubation (IE) versus UFTA.

METHODS

Sixty patients were enrolled who underwent OPCAB surgery. The two groups IE and UFTA had thirty patients each. Inclusion criteria were patients for OPCAB surgery including left main stenosis. Exclusion criteria were patients with Ejection Fraction(EF) <30%, with unstable hemodynamics, on intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), with renal dysfunction, with associated valvular heart diseases, on inotropes, on temporary pacemaker, with intraoperative conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), who are chronic smokers, and with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Statistical analysis was done with Minitab 15 software. Descriptive statistics were summarized as mean, standard deviation, and percentage. Student's t-test was used to determine the significance of normally distributed parametric values. Z-test was used for proportion. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

OT extubation was found to be safe as no patient had reintubation or respiratory insufficiency. None of the patients in either group had postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, low cardiac output, mediastinitis, and renal failure. Hypothermia, blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, and re-exploration did not occur. Intensive Care Unit length of stay was similar in the two groups. Discharge day is statistically significant (P = 0.001), with 5.66 days in the IE group and 6.36 days in the UFTA group. Time spent in the operating room at the end of surgery is statistically significant, with 14.03 min in UFTA group and 33.9 min in IE group.

CONCLUSION

IE appears to be safe and effective in OPCAB patients without any major complications. It can be achieved after fulfilling traditional extubation criteria but is confined to highly selective group of patients.

摘要

引言

麻醉的超快追踪(UFTA)是常规操作,而不停跳冠状动脉搭桥(OPCAB)手术术后即刻拔管存在诸多问题。我们研究的目的是评估即刻拔管(IE)与UFTA的安全性和可行性。

方法

纳入60例行OPCAB手术的患者。IE组和UFTA组各30例患者。纳入标准为行OPCAB手术包括左主干狭窄的患者。排除标准为射血分数(EF)<30%、血流动力学不稳定、使用主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)、肾功能不全、合并瓣膜性心脏病、使用血管活性药物、使用临时起搏器、术中转为体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)、慢性吸烟者以及患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者。使用Minitab 15软件进行统计分析。描述性统计结果以均值、标准差和百分比表示。采用学生t检验确定正态分布参数值的显著性。采用Z检验分析比例。P<0.05时认为具有统计学显著性。

结果

发现手术室拔管是安全的,因为没有患者需要再次插管或出现呼吸功能不全。两组患者均未发生术后心肌梗死、中风、低心排血量、纵隔炎和肾衰竭。未出现体温过低、输血、房颤和再次手术探查情况。两组患者在重症监护病房的住院时间相似。出院日具有统计学显著性(P = 0.001),IE组为5.66天,UFTA组为6.36天。手术结束时在手术室的停留时间具有统计学显著性,UFTA组为14.03分钟,IE组为33.9分钟。

结论

对于OPCAB患者,IE似乎是安全有效的,且无任何重大并发症。在满足传统拔管标准后即可实现,但仅限于高度选择性的患者群体。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的麻醉
Ann Card Anaesth. 2013 Jan-Mar;16(1):28-39. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.105367.
3
Pro: early extubation in the operating room following cardiac surgery in adults.优点:成人心脏手术后在手术室早期拔管。
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Dec;16(4):182-6. doi: 10.1177/1089253212451150. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验