Suppr超能文献

1196 例连续患者不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术后即刻拔管:可行性、安全性和不尝试拔管的预测因素。

Immediate extubation after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 1,196 consecutive patients: feasibility, safety and predictors of when not to attempt it.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Jun;25(3):431-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of immediate extubation (ultrafast-track anesthesia [UFTA]) in the operating room, and the predictors of when not to attempt it in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB).

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

A private hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand one hundred ninety-six patients undergoing OPCAB surgery, representing 4 years of a single anesthesia service's practice (3 anesthesiologists), were evaluated for immediate extubation. All patients were considered amenable to immediate extubation if specific criteria were met.

INTERVENTION

Patients received general anesthesia (UFTA protocol) and underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One thousand sixty-five patients (89%) met extubation criteria and were extubated successfully in the operating room. By multivariate analysis, the following independent predictors of avoiding immediate extubation were identified: reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9, p < 0.001), pre-existing renal disease (OR = 3.1, p < 0.0001), diabetes (OR = 1.7, p < 0.007), preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump placement (OR = 7.4, p < 0.0001), and total surgical time (OR = 3.7, p < 0.0001). Patients who met extubation criteria had lower in-hospital reintubation (2.5% v 16%, p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (1.03% v 4.58%, p = 0.001), renal insufficiency (2.2% v 7.63%, p < 0.001), stroke (0.4% v 2.29%, p = 0.032), and mortality rates (1.2% v 10.7%, p < 0.001) than patients who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

UFTA is feasible and safe in most patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. Baseline and intraoperative data predicted when immediate extubation should not be attempted.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)患者在手术室中即刻拔管(超快通道麻醉[UFTA])的可行性和安全性,以及预测哪些患者不能尝试即刻拔管。

设计

病例系列。

设置

一家私立医院。

参与者

评估了 1196 例接受 OPCAB 手术的患者,代表了 4 年中单个麻醉服务的实践(3 位麻醉医师),这些患者都符合即刻拔管的标准。如果符合特定标准,所有患者都被认为可以进行即刻拔管。

干预

患者接受全身麻醉(UFTA 方案)并接受 OPCAB 手术。

测量和主要结果

1065 例(89%)患者符合拔管标准,并在手术室中成功拔管。通过多变量分析,确定了避免即刻拔管的以下独立预测因素:再次手术(比值比[OR] = 3.9,p < 0.001)、术前存在的肾脏疾病(OR = 3.1,p < 0.0001)、糖尿病(OR = 1.7,p < 0.007)、术前主动脉内球囊泵放置(OR = 7.4,p < 0.0001)和总手术时间(OR = 3.7,p < 0.0001)。符合拔管标准的患者院内再插管率较低(2.5%比 16%,p < 0.001)、心肌梗死发生率(1.03%比 4.58%,p = 0.001)、肾功能不全发生率(2.2%比 7.63%,p < 0.001)、中风发生率(0.4%比 2.29%,p = 0.032)和死亡率(1.2%比 10.7%,p < 0.001)均低于未行即刻拔管的患者。

结论

UFTA 对于大多数接受 OPCAB 手术的患者是可行且安全的。基线和术中数据预测了何时不应尝试即刻拔管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验