Suppr超能文献

残疾婴儿:医学伦理与法律

Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.

作者信息

Raphael D D

机构信息

Department of Humanities, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1988 Mar;14(1):5-10. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.1.5.

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper (1) is to draw attention to a gap between the principles of Common Law and the principles accepted by many leading medical practitioners on the ethics of allowing severely handicapped infants to die. The Common Law principles are shown in Court of Appeal judgements on two cases. The contrasting principles of many paediatricians were illustrated at the trial of Dr Leonard Arthur. The paper suggests that the gap could be closed by statutory guidance on general principles. It also argues that utilitarian concepts misrepresent the ethical issues of medical dilemmas like this one.

摘要

本文的主要目的(1)是提请注意普通法原则与许多顶尖医学从业者在允许严重残疾婴儿死亡的伦理问题上所接受的原则之间的差距。普通法原则体现在上诉法院对两起案件的判决中。许多儿科医生的不同原则在伦纳德·亚瑟医生的审判中得到了体现。本文认为,通过关于一般原则的法定指导可以弥合这一差距。它还认为,功利主义概念歪曲了此类医疗困境的伦理问题。

相似文献

1
Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.残疾婴儿:医学伦理与法律
J Med Ethics. 1988 Mar;14(1):5-10. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.1.5.
2
An introduction to philosophical medical ethics: the Arthur case.哲学医学伦理学导论:亚瑟案例
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Apr 13;290(6475):1117-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6475.1117.
5
Killing and allowing to die in medical practice.医疗实践中的杀人与听任死亡
J Med Ethics. 1984 Jun;10(2):82-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.2.82.
6
Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989 Feb;15(2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30266-4.
7
Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-215.
9
Severely handicapped babies and the law.重度残疾婴儿与法律。
Lancet. 1986 Apr 26;1(8487):984-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91094-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验