Suppr超能文献

Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.

作者信息

Robertson J A

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-215.

Abstract

The controversy over nontreatment of handicapped newborns arises in a context of criminal and civil law, against which the current controversy has unfolded. This article examines the legal setting and background under traditional criminal and civil law concepts of nontreatment of handicapped newborns. It focuses on substantive principles of law, showing that nontreatment would be legally permitted when treatment could not be reasonably said to be in the interest of the patient involved, and that nontreatment could be considered criminal where treatment would serve patient interests. It then relates this analysis to procedural issues and the federal Baby Doe legislation and regulations that have recently emerged.

摘要

相似文献

1
Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-215.
2
The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.反堕胎运动与无名女婴简
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):255-69. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-255.
4
Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):231-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-231.
5
Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):199-213. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-199.
7
Selecting neonatal ethics.选择新生儿伦理学
Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(11):1085-90. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90184-4.
8
Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989 Feb;15(2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30266-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验