• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[文化对心理治疗态度的影响——土耳其裔个体与无移民背景个体的比较]

[Cultural Influence on Attitude towards Psychotherapy - A Comparison of Individuals of Turkish Origin with Individuals without Migration Background].

作者信息

Bretz Joachim, Sahin Dilek, Brandl Eva Janina, Schouler-Ocak Meryam

机构信息

Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik der Charité im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Berlin.

Gesundheitsamt, Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrischer Dienst, Berlin.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019 May;69(5):176-181. doi: 10.1055/a-0583-1093. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1055/a-0583-1093
PMID:29653459
Abstract

AIM

The present study compares the attitude towards psychotherapy of persons living in Germany with or without Turkish background. In this context, gender-related, disorder-specific and sociodemographic differences in openness towards psychotherapy are taken into account.

METHODS

Individuals of Turkish origin (n=129) and individuals without migration background (n=129) were interviewed with the Questionnaire on Attitudes towards Psychotherapeutic Treatment, the Social Support Questionnaire, a short version of the Symptom-Checklist with the subscales anxiety, depression and somatization, and a sociodemographic questionnaire.

RESULTS

The attitude towards psychotherapy is less positive in Turkish migrants than in people without migration background. Females, depressive individuals, persons with high social support, with children and a high level of education are more open towards psychotherapy.

DISCUSSION

The attitude towards psychotherapy is influenced by gender, socio-demographic and disorder-specific factors and in particular by cultural factors.

CONCLUSION

These results elucidate the need for better information about psychotherapy and the development of intercultural consulting services for migrants in Germany.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了有或没有土耳其背景的德国居民对心理治疗的态度。在此背景下,考虑了在对心理治疗的接受程度方面与性别、特定疾病和社会人口统计学相关的差异。

方法

对土耳其裔个体(n = 129)和无移民背景的个体(n = 129)进行了访谈,使用了《心理治疗态度问卷》、《社会支持问卷》、包含焦虑、抑郁和躯体化分量表的症状清单简版以及一份社会人口统计学问卷。

结果

土耳其移民对心理治疗的态度不如无移民背景的人积极。女性、抑郁个体、社会支持度高的人、有孩子的人和受教育程度高的人对心理治疗更开放。

讨论

对心理治疗的态度受性别、社会人口统计学和特定疾病因素影响,尤其是受文化因素影响。

结论

这些结果表明有必要更好地宣传心理治疗,并为德国的移民开发跨文化咨询服务。

相似文献

1
[Cultural Influence on Attitude towards Psychotherapy - A Comparison of Individuals of Turkish Origin with Individuals without Migration Background].[文化对心理治疗态度的影响——土耳其裔个体与无移民背景个体的比较]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019 May;69(5):176-181. doi: 10.1055/a-0583-1093. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
[Attitudes towards psychotherapy of young second-generation Turkish immigrants living in Germany].[德国年轻的第二代土耳其移民对心理治疗的态度]
Psychiatr Prax. 2007 Oct;34(7):343-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986191.
3
Motivation for Psychotherapy and Illness Beliefs in Turkish Immigrant Inpatients in Germany: Results of a Cultural Comparison Study.德国土耳其移民住院患者的心理治疗动机和疾病信念:一项文化比较研究的结果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015 Mar;2(1):112-23. doi: 10.1007/s40615-014-0054-y. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
[Attitude towards psychotherapy in the Russian population and in the population with a Russian/Soviet cultural background in Germany. A pilot study].[俄罗斯民众以及德国具有俄罗斯/苏联文化背景的人群对心理治疗的态度。一项试点研究]
Nervenarzt. 2006 Jan;77(1):64-72. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1889-6.
5
Attitudes towards psychopharmacology and psychotherapy in psychiatric patients with and without migration background.有和没有移民背景的精神科患者对精神药理学和心理治疗的态度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02585-1.
6
Symptom manifestation and treatment effectiveness, -obstacles and -facilitators in Turkish and Moroccan groups with depression in European countries: A systematic review.在欧洲国家中,患有抑郁症的土耳其和摩洛哥群体的症状表现和治疗效果、障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 15;247:134-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.060. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
The influence of stigma on depression, overall psychological distress, and somatization among female Turkish migrants.土耳其女性移民中的耻辱感对抑郁、总体心理困扰和躯体化的影响。
Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 2:S22-6. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(12)75704-8.
8
[Development of "Cologne Culture ADL" for dementia diagnosis in individuals with Turkish migration background and in German patients].[针对具有土耳其移民背景的个体及德国患者开发用于痴呆诊断的“科隆文化日常生活能力量表”]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2019 Sep;87(9):504-510. doi: 10.1055/a-0877-6945. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
9
Cross-cultural validation of the German and Turkish versions of the PHQ-9: an IRT approach.跨文化验证 PHQ-9 德语版和土耳其语版:IRT 方法。
BMC Psychol. 2018 Jun 5;6(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0238-z.
10
[Psychotherapy with traumatised migrants from Turkey: taking into account cultural factors].[针对来自土耳其的受创伤移民的心理治疗:考虑文化因素]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(3-4):169-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067350.

引用本文的文献

1
Aetiological research on the health of migrants living in Germany: a systematic literature review.德国移民健康的病因学研究:系统文献综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e058712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058712.
2
Predictors for successful psychotherapy: Does migration status matter?成功心理治疗的预测因素:移民身份是否重要?
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257387. eCollection 2021.
3
Effectiveness of Inpatient Psychotherapy for Patients With and Without Migratory Background: Do They Benefit Equally?
有和没有移民背景的患者住院心理治疗的有效性:他们的受益是否相同?
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 11;11:542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00542. eCollection 2020.
4
Attitudes towards psychopharmacology and psychotherapy in psychiatric patients with and without migration background.有和没有移民背景的精神科患者对精神药理学和心理治疗的态度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02585-1.
5
Gender-Specific Aspects of Health Literacy: Perceptions of Interactions with Migrants among Health Care Providers in Germany.健康素养的性别特定方面:德国医疗保健提供者对与移民互动的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072189.