• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我调节手机互动时的驾驶行为:人机系统方法。

Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.

机构信息

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety - Queensland (CARRS-Q), Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Faculty of Health, Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland, Australia; Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Colombia.

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety - Queensland (CARRS-Q), Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Faculty of Health, Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:253-262. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.020
PMID:29653674
Abstract

Mobile phone distracted driving is a recurrent issue in road safety worldwide. Recent research on driving behaviour of distracted drivers suggests that in certain circumstances drivers seem to assume safer behaviours while using a mobile phone. Despite a high volume of research on this topic, self-regulation by mobile phone distracted drivers is not well understood as many driving simulator experiments are designed to impose an equal level of distraction to participants being tested for their driving performance. The aim of this research was to investigate the relationship between self-regulatory secondary task performance and driving. By a driving simulator experiment in which participants were allowed to perform their secondary tasks whenever they feel appropriate, the driving performance of 35 drivers aged 18-29 years was observed under three phone conditions including non-distraction (no phone use), hands-free interactions and visual-manual interactions in the CARRS-Q advanced driving simulator. Drivers' longitudinal and lateral vehicle control observed across various road traffic conditions were then modelled by Generalized Estimation Equations (GEE) with exchangeable correlation structure accounting for heterogeneity resulting from multiple observations from the same driver. Results show that the extent of engagement in the secondary task influence both longitudinal and lateral control of vehicles. Drivers who engaged in a large number of hands-free interactions are found to select lower driving speed. In contrast, longer visual-manual interactions are found to result in higher driving speed among drivers self-regulating their secondary task. Among the road traffic conditions, drivers distracted by their self-regulated secondary tasks are found to select lower speeds along the s-curve compared to straight and motorway segments. In summary, the applied human-machine system approach suggests that road traffic demands play a vital role in both secondary task management and driving performance.

摘要

手机分散驾驶是全球道路安全的一个反复出现的问题。最近对分心驾驶行为的研究表明,在某些情况下,司机在使用手机时似乎会采取更安全的行为。尽管针对这个主题进行了大量研究,但由于许多驾驶模拟器实验旨在向被测试驾驶性能的参与者施加同等程度的分心,因此手机分心司机的自我调节行为仍未得到很好的理解。本研究旨在调查自我调节次要任务表现与驾驶之间的关系。通过驾驶模拟器实验,参与者可以在他们认为合适的任何时候执行他们的次要任务,观察了 35 名年龄在 18-29 岁之间的司机在三种手机条件下的驾驶性能,包括非分心(不使用手机)、免提交互和在 CARRS-Q 高级驾驶模拟器中的视觉手动交互。然后通过广义估计方程(GEE)对各种道路交通条件下观察到的驾驶员的纵向和横向车辆控制进行建模,该方程采用可交换相关结构来解释来自同一驾驶员的多次观测产生的异质性。结果表明,参与次要任务的程度会影响车辆的纵向和横向控制。发现进行大量免提交互的驾驶员会选择较低的驾驶速度。相比之下,发现自我调节次要任务的驾驶员进行较长时间的视觉手动交互会导致驾驶速度较高。在道路交通条件中,与直道和高速公路段相比,自我调节次要任务的驾驶员发现选择的速度较低。总的来说,应用的人机系统方法表明,道路交通需求在次要任务管理和驾驶性能中都起着至关重要的作用。

相似文献

1
Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.自我调节手机互动时的驾驶行为:人机系统方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:253-262. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
"Mate! I'm running 10 min late": An investigation into the self-regulation of mobile phone tasks while driving.“伙计!我要晚到 10 分钟”:对驾驶时手机任务自我调节的调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory.分心驾驶者的行驶速度自我调节:驾驶员行为适应理论的应用
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Aug 18;18(6):599-605. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1278628. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.手机使用对年轻驾驶员跟车行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Sep;82:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 23.
6
The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.自我调节在驾驶员注意力分散情境中的作用:一项模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Jul 3;17(5):472-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1102231. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.驾驶员在手机通话中分心时的反应时间的参数持续时间模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
Gap acceptance behaviour and crash risks of mobile phone distracted young drivers at roundabouts: A random parameters survival model.环岛处使用手机分散年轻驾驶员注意力时的行车视距接受行为和碰撞风险:随机参数生存模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107720. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107720. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
9
Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.跟车交互中分心年轻驾驶员制动行为建模:一种均值异质性分组随机参数持续时间模型
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jun;185:107015. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107015. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.考察分心驾驶时驾驶员的眼动模式:来自扫视随机性和眼跳转换矩阵的洞察。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of peripheral vision on driving performance in patients implanted with an inverted meniscus intraocular lens.植入倒置半月板人工晶状体患者的周边视觉对驾驶性能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93840-6.
2
Effect of Partially Automated Driving on Mental Workload, Visual Behavior and Engagement in Nondriving-Related Tasks: A Meta-Analysis.部分自动驾驶对心理负荷、视觉行为及非驾驶相关任务参与度的影响:一项荟萃分析
Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 3;67(9):187208251323132. doi: 10.1177/00187208251323132.
3
"It's okay because I'm just driving": an exploration of self-reported mobile phone use among Mexican drivers.
“没事,因为我只是在开车时用手机”:对墨西哥司机自述使用手机情况的探索。
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 23;12:e16899. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16899. eCollection 2024.
4
Persistent effects of mobile phone conversation while driving after disconnect: Physiological evidence and driving performance.驾驶结束后手机通话的持续影响:生理证据与驾驶表现。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 23;9(6):e17501. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17501. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving.道路交通环境对驾驶时次要任务参与度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1139373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139373. eCollection 2023.
6
Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.文本驾驶:驾驶模拟器研究文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054354.
7
Drivers' unsafe behaviors in Iran: An investigation in West Azerbaijan.伊朗驾驶员的不安全行为:西阿塞拜疆的调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;10:815380. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.815380. eCollection 2022.
8
Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.边开车边打电话:驾驶模拟器研究文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710554.
9
The Effects of Dynamic Complexity on Drivers' Secondary Task Scanning Behavior under a Car-Following Scenario.跟驰场景下动态复杂性对驾驶员次要任务扫描行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 8;19(3):1881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031881.
10
Associations between symptoms of problematic smartphone, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram use: An item-level exploratory graph analysis perspective.智能手机、Facebook、WhatsApp 和 Instagram 使用问题症状之间的关联:项目层面的探索性图形分析视角。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Aug 13;9(3):686-697. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00036. Print 2020 Oct 12.