Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, RR#1 5421 Robertson Road, Delta, BC, V4K 3N2, Canada.
Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, BC, V8L 4B2, Canada.
Environ Pollut. 2018 Aug;239:215-222. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
We assessed the potential role played by two vital Northeastern Pacific Ocean forage fishes, the Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes personatus) and Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), as conduits for the vertical transfer of microfibres in food webs. We quantified the number of microfibres found in the stomachs of 734 sand lance and 205 herring that had been captured by an abundant seabird, the rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). Sampling took place on six widely-dispersed breeding colonies in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington State, USA, over one to eight years. The North Pacific Ocean is a global hotspot for pollution, yet few sand lance (1.5%) or herring (2.0%) had ingested microfibres. In addition, there was no systematic relationship between the prevalence of microplastics in the fish stomachs vs. in waters around three of our study colonies (measured in an earlier study). Sampling at a single site (Protection Island, WA) in a single year (2016) yielded most (sand lance) or all (herring) of the microfibres recovered over the 30 colony-years of sampling involved in this study, yet no microfibres had been recovered there, in either species, in the previous year. We thus found no evidence that sand lance and herring currently act as major food-web conduits for microfibres along British Columbia's outer coast, nor that the local at-sea density of plastic necessarily determines how much plastic enters marine food webs via zooplanktivores. Extensive urban development around the Salish Sea probably explains the elevated microfibre loads in fishes collected on Protection Island, but we cannot account for the between-year variation. Nonetheless, the existence of such marked interannual variation indicates the importance of measuring year-to-year variation in microfibre pollution both at sea and in marine biota.
我们评估了两种重要的东北太平洋饲料鱼类——太平洋玉筋鱼(Ammodytes personatus)和太平洋鲱鱼(Clupea pallasii)——作为海洋食物网中微纤维垂直传递的渠道所发挥的潜在作用。我们对在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省和美国华盛顿州的六个广泛分散的繁殖地,通过一种丰富的海鸟——黑叉鼻企鹅(Cerorhinca monocerata)捕获的 734 条玉筋鱼和 205 条鲱鱼的胃中发现的微纤维数量进行了量化。采样时间为 1 至 8 年。北太平洋是全球污染热点,但只有 1.5%的玉筋鱼或 2.0%的鲱鱼摄入了微纤维。此外,在鱼类胃中微塑料的流行率与我们研究的三个海鸟繁殖地周围水域之间没有系统的关系(在早期研究中测量)。在一个单一地点(华盛顿州的保护岛)和一个单一年份(2016 年)进行采样,获得了本研究涉及的 30 个繁殖地年采样中回收的大部分(玉筋鱼)或全部(鲱鱼)微纤维,但在该地点,在过去的一年中,在这两个物种中都没有回收到微纤维。因此,我们没有发现玉筋鱼和鲱鱼目前作为不列颠哥伦比亚省外海微纤维主要食物网通道的证据,也没有证据表明海洋中浮游动物的塑料密度必然决定了有多少塑料通过浮游动物进入海洋食物网。萨利希海周围广泛的城市发展可能解释了在保护岛收集的鱼类中微纤维负荷的升高,但我们无法解释年际变化。尽管如此,这种明显的年际变化表明,在海洋和海洋生物群中测量微纤维污染的年度变化非常重要。