Ettensohn D B, Lalor P A, Roberts N J
Department of Medicine, Memorial Hospital, Pawtucket, RI 02860.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Apr;137(4):765-73. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.4.765.
Human alveolar macrophages (AM) provide less accessory support for mitogen- and antigen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation than do autologous blood-derived macrophages (BM). This is at least in part due to suppression mediated by AM, but the mechanism of such suppression is not understood. To determine whether AM-mediated suppression is related to AM interaction with suppressor lymphocytes (Ts), we examined the accessory cell function of both AM and BM for the generation and functional expression of Ts induced by concanavalin A (Con A). The data indicate that human AM are equivalent to BM for the generation of Con A-induced Ts, but AM mediate less suppression of Con A-induced Ts, once generated, than do BM. Addition of indomethacin did not increase lymphocyte proliferation when AM served as accessory cells. Supernatant fluids of Con A-exposed AM promoted greater proliferation of human T-lymphocytes and mouse thymocytes than did supernatant fluids from Con A-exposed BM. Interleukin-1 inhibitor activity was not detected in the supernatant fluids. These observations make it unlikely that soluble factors alone account for AM-mediated suppression. Thus, at least for the Con A-induced Ts system, AM do not mediate suppression either via better generation or greater functional expression of suppressor cells relative to BM. The paradoxically greater proliferation of lymphocytes stimulated by the supernatant fluids of Con A-exposed AM raises the possibility that suppression of Con A-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation observed when AM serve as the accessory cells in primary culture may be related to AM secretion of a molecule with IL-1-like activity.
与自体血源巨噬细胞(BM)相比,人肺泡巨噬细胞(AM)对丝裂原和抗原刺激的淋巴细胞增殖提供的辅助支持较少。这至少部分归因于AM介导的抑制作用,但其抑制机制尚不清楚。为了确定AM介导的抑制作用是否与AM和抑制性淋巴细胞(Ts)的相互作用有关,我们检测了AM和BM在由刀豆蛋白A(Con A)诱导的Ts产生和功能表达方面的辅助细胞功能。数据表明,在产生Con A诱导的Ts方面,人AM与BM相当,但一旦产生,AM对Con A诱导的Ts的抑制作用比BM弱。当AM作为辅助细胞时,添加消炎痛并不能增加淋巴细胞增殖。Con A刺激的AM的上清液比Con A刺激的BM的上清液能促进人T淋巴细胞和小鼠胸腺细胞的更大增殖。在上清液中未检测到白细胞介素-1抑制活性。这些观察结果表明,单独的可溶性因子不太可能是AM介导的抑制作用的原因。因此,至少对于Con A诱导的Ts系统,相对于BM,AM不是通过更好地产生抑制细胞或使其具有更大的功能表达来介导抑制作用。Con A刺激的AM的上清液刺激淋巴细胞增殖的现象反而更明显,这增加了一种可能性,即在原代培养中当AM作为辅助细胞时观察到的Con A刺激的淋巴细胞增殖受到抑制,可能与AM分泌具有白细胞介素-1样活性的分子有关。