• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠期开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的术后结局:一项荟萃分析。

Outcomes after open and laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Prodromidou Anastasia, Machairas Nikolaos, Kostakis Ioannis D, Molmenti Ernesto, Spartalis Eleftherios, Kakkos Athanasios, Lainas Georgios T, Sotiropoulos Georgios C

机构信息

Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, "Laiko" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.

Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, "Laiko" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jun;225:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.010
PMID:29656140
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Acute appendicitis is the most prevalent cause of non-obstetrical surgical disease during pregnancy. There is no consensus on the optimal surgical management of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Our aim is to identify surgical and obstetrical outcomes of laparoscopic (LA) and open approach (OA) in pregnant patients with acute appendicitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for articles published up to May 2017, along with the references of all articles. Prospective and retrospective trials reporting outcomes among pregnant women undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy were included. Of the 493 records screened, 20 were eligible for meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 6210 pregnant women from twenty studies were included in meta-analysis. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with significantly lower overall complication rates and shorter hospital stays (1835 patients OR 0.48 95% CI 0.29, 0.80 p = 0.005). While the open appendectomy group showed prolongation of gestational age for term deliveries, laparoscopic appendectomy patients had higher rates of fetal loss (543 patients MD -0.46 weeks 95% CI-0.87 to -0.04, p = 0.03 and 4867 patients OR 1.82 95% CI 1.30 to 2.57, p = 0.0006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature remains inconclusive on the optimal approach of appendectomy in pregnant women. Further larger-volume studies are needed in order to elucidate the critical effect of laparoscopic appendectomy on fetal loss rates.

摘要

目的

急性阑尾炎是孕期非产科外科疾病最常见的病因。对于孕期急性阑尾炎的最佳手术治疗方法尚无共识。我们的目的是确定妊娠合并急性阑尾炎患者行腹腔镜手术(LA)和开腹手术(OA)的手术及产科结局。

研究设计

检索了Medline、Scopus、谷歌学术、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库中截至2017年5月发表的文章以及所有文章的参考文献。纳入报告行腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术的孕妇结局的前瞻性和回顾性试验。在筛选的493条记录中,20条符合荟萃分析的条件。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。使用RevMan 5.3软件进行统计荟萃分析。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了来自20项研究的共6210名孕妇。腹腔镜阑尾切除术与总体并发症发生率显著降低和住院时间缩短相关(1835例患者,OR 0.48,95%CI 0.29至0.80,p = 0.005)。虽然开腹阑尾切除术组足月分娩的孕周延长,但腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者的胎儿丢失率更高(543例患者,MD -0.46周,95%CI -0.87至-0.04,p = 0.03;4867例患者,OR 1.82,95%CI 1.30至2.57,p = 0.0006)。

结论

目前的文献对于孕妇阑尾切除术的最佳方法仍无定论。需要进一步开展更大规模的研究,以阐明腹腔镜阑尾切除术对胎儿丢失率的关键影响。

相似文献

1
Outcomes after open and laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy: A meta-analysis.妊娠期开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的术后结局:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jun;225:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
2
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.妊娠期疑似阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0505-9.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review.妊娠期腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项系统评价
Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
4
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study.经腹式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的比较:基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6025-6031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10075-0. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Is the laparoscopic approach a safe choice for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnant women? A meta-analysis of observational studies.腹腔镜手术治疗孕妇急性阑尾炎是否安全?一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Apr;101(4):235-248. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0011. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
6
Appendectomy during early pregnancy: what is the preferred surgical approach?孕早期行阑尾切除术:首选的手术方式是什么?
Am Surg. 2005 Oct;71(10):809-12.
7
Maternal and fetal outcomes after laparoscopic vs. Open appendectomy in pregnant women: data from two tertiary referral centers.孕妇腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术后的母婴结局:来自两家三级转诊中心的数据。
Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(2):98-103. doi: 10.17772/gp/58752.
8
Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis ?A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎是否可行?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Appendectomy during pregnancy--is pregnancy outcome depending by operation technique?孕期阑尾切除术——妊娠结局取决于手术技术吗?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Mar;27(4):365-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.818131. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
Appendectomy in Pregnancy: Appraisal of the Minimally Invasive Approach.妊娠期间的阑尾切除术:微创方法评估
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):893-897. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0280. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnant patients requiring emergency general surgery: a scoping review of diagnostic and management strategies.需要急诊普通外科手术的孕妇:诊断和管理策略的范围综述
Can J Surg. 2025 May 29;68(3):E190-E213. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001124. Print 2025 May-Jun.
2
Laparoscopic Surgery During Pregnancy: A Meta-Review and Quality Analysis Using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 Instrument.妊娠期腹腔镜手术:使用多系统评价评估(AMSTAR)2工具的Meta综述与质量分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):e63521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63521. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
TU-LESS procedure for acute abdomen in late pregnancy: a retrospective study.
晚期妊娠急腹症的TU-LESS手术:一项回顾性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07573-4. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Imaging of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy and Puerperium-Part II: Non-Obstetric Complications.妊娠和产褥期急性腹盆腔疼痛的影像学检查——第二部分:非产科并发症
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;13(18):2909. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182909.
5
Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in a Second-trimester Pregnant Woman with an Ovarian Teratoma.孕中期卵巢畸胎瘤孕妇的经阴道自然腔道内镜手术
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Apr 19;12(2):116-119. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_107_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
6
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal disease during pregnancy: A single-center preliminary experience.妊娠期附件疾病的经脐单孔腹腔镜手术:单中心初步经验
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 14;9:994360. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.994360. eCollection 2022.
7
Differential diagnoses of right lower quadrant pain in late pregnancy.晚期妊娠右下象限疼痛的鉴别诊断。
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul 25;2022(7):rjac200. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac200. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Association of treatments for acute appendicitis with pregnancy outcomes in the United States from 2000 to 2016: Results from a multi-level analysis.2000 年至 2016 年美国急性阑尾炎治疗与妊娠结局的关联:多层次分析结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0260991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260991. eCollection 2021.
9
Analysis of 190 Female Patients after Appendectomy.190例女性阑尾切除术后患者的分析
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021 Nov 27;2021:8036970. doi: 10.1155/2021/8036970. eCollection 2021.
10
Updated Evaluation of Laparoscopic vs. Open Appendicectomy During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.孕期腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的最新评估:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 23;8:720351. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.720351. eCollection 2021.