Occipital Condyle Fractures and Concomitant Cervical Spine Fractures: Implications for Management.

BACKGROUND

Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) have traditionally been described based on anatomic characteristics; however, recent literature has proposed management based on biomechanical stability and neural element compression. The treatment of biomechanically stable fractures varies between observation and cervical immobilization. Before determining the best management approach, an understanding of concomitant cervical spine fractures in the presence of OCFs is important. The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine the rate of occurrence of biomechanically significant cervical spine fractures with OCFs.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of 13,363 patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center between 2013 and 2017 with a diagnosis of OCF.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients presented with OCFs, with an average Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 on presentation and an average Injury Severity Score of 23. The average patient age was 42.1 years, and 4 patients had bilateral OCFs. Approximately 30% of these patients had associated intracranial injuries and 59% had an associated cervical spine injury. The overall rate of associated potentially biomechanically significant cervical spine fracture was 43.5%. Treatment of OCFs included collar immobilization (83%) and observation (17%). The average duration of follow-up was 3.37 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study characterizes cervical spine fractures that occur concomitantly with OCFs. The results indicate that more than one-half of patients with OCFs do not have biomechanically significant fractures elsewhere in the cervical spine. This subset of patients will be the cohort for a prospective study to assess whether collar immobilization is necessary.