Kweh Barry Ting Sheen, Vaccaro Alexander R, Schroeder Gregory, Canseco Jose A, Reinhold Maximilian, Aly Mohamed, Bigdon Sebastian, El-Skarkawi Mohamed, Bransford Richard J, Joaquim Andrei Fernandes, Chhabra Harvinder Singh, Vialle Emiliano, Kanna Rishi M, Dandurand Charlotte, Öner Cumhur, Tee Jin Wee
National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Neurosurgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 17:21925682251351943. doi: 10.1177/21925682251351943.
Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesTo describe existing craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine classification systems and their integration into a unified rational hierarchical system of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System (UCIC).MethodsA systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases was performed in keeping with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.Results859 articles were identified which yielded 10 established classification systems for injuries of the occipital condyles, craniocervical junction as well as atlas and axis. All systems were either non-hierarchical, conferred minimal clinical significance or failed to consider neurological status of patients. For example, the Traynelis classification simply relies upon describing the direction of displacement which has dubious clinical significance. Similarly, the Jefferson description of atlas fractures simply grades injuries by fracture line pattern. The AO Spine UCIC system synthesizes each published historical scheme into a rational graded method by which clinicians can assess the severity of injuries to this region. The three grades of injury range from type A being generally stable bony injuries, type B constituting potentially unstable (osseoligamentous) injuries and type C representing grossly unstable translational injuries.ConclusionThe AO Spine UCIC System is a validated methodoogy of integrating historical landmark grading systems and evolving this into a structured means of grading severity of injuries to guide timely clinical management. The implementation of this universal system will enable clinicians to consistently assess craniocervical junction injuries and implement appropriate managemen strategies. Future studies will examine outcomes after operative or non-operative management with progression to a standardized quantified algorithm.
系统评价。
描述现有的颅颈交界区和上颈椎分类系统,以及它们如何整合到AO脊柱上颈椎损伤分类系统(UCIC)的统一合理分层系统中。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行系统评价。
共识别出859篇文章,从中得出10种已确立的枕髁、颅颈交界区以及寰椎和枢椎损伤的分类系统。所有系统要么是非分层的,临床意义极小,要么未考虑患者的神经状态。例如,Traynelis分类仅仅依靠描述移位方向,其临床意义存疑。同样,Jefferson对寰椎骨折的描述只是根据骨折线模式对损伤进行分级。AO脊柱UCIC系统将每个已发表的历史方案综合成一种合理的分级方法,临床医生可以据此评估该区域损伤的严重程度。损伤的三个等级范围从A型通常为稳定的骨损伤,B型为潜在不稳定(骨韧带)损伤,C型代表严重不稳定的平移损伤。
AO脊柱UCIC系统是一种经过验证的方法,它整合了历史标志性分级系统,并将其发展成为一种结构化的损伤严重程度分级方法,以指导及时的临床管理。这一通用系统的实施将使临床医生能够始终如一地评估颅颈交界区损伤并实施适当的管理策略。未来的研究将检查手术或非手术治疗后的结果,并逐步发展为标准化的量化算法。