Jacobs David R, Hahn Lorraine P, Haskell William L, Pirie Phyllis, Sidney Stephen
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1989 Nov;9(11):448-459. doi: 10.1097/00008483-198911000-00003.
Validity and reliability of a short physical activity history were assessed in two studies. Validity was studied in 2766 women and 2303 men, participants in CARDIA, a biracial study. Ages ranged from 18 to 30 years. The activities performed in the past 12 months by ≥ 50 percent of participants were walking/hiking, nonstrenuous sports, shoveling/lifting during leisure, running/jogging and home maintenance/gardening. Validity was indirectly assessed by studying the relationships of total activity to skinfold thickness, total caloric intake, duration on a self-limited maximal exercise test, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Less than perfect correlation are expected since physical activity is not the only factor affecting the validation criteria and since physical activity patterns change over time within each person. Comparing the highest physical activity quartile to the lowest physical activity quartile, mean level of sum of three skinfolds was 10.7 mm less for women (correlation coefficient (r) = -0.15, P < 0.001) and 6.9 mm less for men (r = -0.12, P < 0.001); mean level of caloric intake was 158 kcal morefor women (r = 0.07, P < 0.001) and 875 kcal morefor men (r = 0.21, P < 0.001); mean level of duration on treadmill was 132 seconds more for women (r = 0.36, P < 0.001) and 95 seconds more for women (r = 0.25, P < 0.001); and mean level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol was 4.8 mg/dL more for women (r = 0.13, P < 0.001) and 3.2 mg/dL more for men (r = 0.11, P < 0.001). Reliability was studied in a separate population by comparing questionnaire results in an initial telephone administration with results obtained two weeks later (N = 129). Similar types and amounts of activity were reported in this group as in the group studied for validity. Test-retest correlation coefficients for three summary scores ranged from 0.77 to 0.84, and were at least 0.57 for each of the 13 activity groupings queried. This questionnaire typically takes 5-10 minutes to administer. It yields moderately detailed information about type and amount of usual leisure time physical activity.
在两项研究中评估了简短身体活动史的有效性和可靠性。在一项涉及2766名女性和2303名男性的双种族研究CARDIA中研究了有效性。参与者年龄在18至30岁之间。≥50%的参与者在过去12个月内进行的活动有步行/徒步旅行、非剧烈运动、休闲时铲土/搬运、跑步/慢跑以及家庭维护/园艺。通过研究总活动量与皮褶厚度、总热量摄入、自限性最大运动测试的持续时间以及高密度脂蛋白胆固醇之间的关系来间接评估有效性。由于身体活动不是影响验证标准的唯一因素,且每个人的身体活动模式会随时间变化,因此预期相关性并非完美。将身体活动量最高的四分位数与最低的四分位数进行比较,女性三个皮褶厚度总和的平均水平低10.7毫米(相关系数(r)= -0.15,P<0.001),男性低6.9毫米(r = -0.12,P<0.001);女性热量摄入平均水平高158千卡(r = 0.07,P<0.001),男性高875千卡(r = 0.21,P<0.001);女性跑步机上的平均持续时间长132秒(r = 0.36,P<0.001),男性长95秒(r = 0.25,P<0.001);女性高密度脂蛋白胆固醇平均水平高4.8毫克/分升(r = 0.13,P<0.001),男性高3.2毫克/分升(r = 0.11,P<0.001)。在另一独立人群中通过比较初次电话调查的问卷结果与两周后获得的结果来研究可靠性(N = 129)。该组报告的活动类型和数量与研究有效性的组相似。三个汇总分数的重测相关系数在0.77至0.84之间,所询问的13个活动分组中每个分组的相关系数至少为0.57。这份问卷通常需要5 - 10分钟来填写。它能提供关于日常休闲时间身体活动类型和数量的适度详细信息。