• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激能量并不能解释两个月大婴儿对脸部的偏好。

Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-olds' face preferences.

作者信息

Kleiner K A, Banks M S

机构信息

School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Nov;13(4):594-600. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.4.594.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.13.4.594
PMID:2965751
Abstract

We examined the determinants of 2-month-olds' preferences among facelike and abstract patterns. Observed preferences were compared with the predictions of two preference models--one based on stimulus energy (as measured by the amplitude spectrum) and the other based on stimulus structure (as measured by the phase spectrum). It is known that the phase spectrum is the primary determinant of perceived identity to adults. Twenty-five 2-month-olds saw six pairings of four patterns: a schematic face, a lattice, a pattern composed of the amplitude spectrum of the lattice and the phase spectrum of the face, and a pattern composed of the amplitude spectrum of the face and the phase spectrum of the lattice. Only patterns with the face's phase spectrum look facelike to adults. Unlike the preferences of newborns (Kleiner, 1987), 2-month-olds' preferences could be predicted from the phase spectrum but not from the amplitude spectrum. In other words, the 2-month-olds preferred the patterns that looked facelike to adults. These results offer clear evidence that 2-month-olds' preferences for facelike patterns are not governed by stimulus energy.

摘要

我们研究了2个月大婴儿在类脸图案和抽象图案之间的偏好决定因素。将观察到的偏好与两种偏好模型的预测结果进行了比较——一种基于刺激能量(通过振幅谱测量),另一种基于刺激结构(通过相位谱测量)。众所周知,相位谱是成年人感知身份的主要决定因素。25名2个月大的婴儿观看了四种图案的六组配对:一张示意脸、一个格子、一个由格子的振幅谱和脸的相位谱组成的图案,以及一个由脸的振幅谱和格子的相位谱组成的图案。只有具有脸的相位谱的图案在成年人看来才像脸。与新生儿的偏好(克莱纳,1987年)不同,2个月大婴儿的偏好可以从相位谱而不是振幅谱中预测出来。换句话说,2个月大的婴儿更喜欢在成年人看来像脸的图案。这些结果提供了明确的证据,表明2个月大婴儿对类脸图案的偏好不受刺激能量的支配。

相似文献

1
Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-olds' face preferences.刺激能量并不能解释两个月大婴儿对脸部的偏好。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Nov;13(4):594-600. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.4.594.
2
A critical test of infant pattern preference models.婴儿模式偏好模型的关键测试。
Child Dev. 1988 Feb;59(1):210-6.
3
Three-month-olds' visual preference for faces and its underlying visual processing mechanisms.三个月大婴儿对人脸的视觉偏好及其潜在的视觉处理机制。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(3):255-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.001. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
4
Perceptual learning: 12-month-olds' discrimination of monkey faces.感知学习:12 个月大的婴儿对猴子面孔的辨别。
Child Dev. 2012 Nov;83(6):1996-2006. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01814.x. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
5
The effects of adults' affective expression and direction of visual gaze on 12-month-olds' visual preferences for an object following a 5-minute, 1-day, or 1-month delay.成人情感表达和视觉注视方向对 12 个月大的婴儿在 5 分钟、1 天或 1 个月延迟后对跟随物体的视觉偏好的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;29(Pt 1):64-85. doi: 10.1348/026151010X512088.
6
Newborns' preference for faces: what is crucial?新生儿对脸部的偏好:关键因素是什么?
Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):875-82.
7
Infants' perception of natural and distorted arrangements of a schematic face.婴儿对示意性面孔的自然排列和扭曲排列的感知。
Child Dev. 1981 Mar;52(1):196-202.
8
Phase- or energy-based face discrimination: some problems.基于相位或能量的面部识别:一些问题。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):217-20. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.217.
9
Newborns discriminate schematic faces from scrambled faces.新生儿能够区分示意性面孔和打乱的面孔。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1999 Sep;53(3):231-41. doi: 10.1037/h0087312.
10
The perception of smiling and its experiential correlates in three-month-old infants.三个月大婴儿对微笑的感知及其体验关联
Child Dev. 1986 Aug;57(4):1054-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' Influence on Infants' Gender-Typed Toy Preferences.父母对婴儿性别定型玩具偏好的影响。
Sex Roles. 2018 Sep;79(5-6):358-373. doi: 10.1007/s11199-017-0858-4. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
The Development of Attentional Biases for Faces in Infancy: A Developmental Systems Perspective.婴儿期对面孔注意偏向的发展:一种发展系统视角
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 28;9:222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00222. eCollection 2018.
3
Emergence of categorical face perception after extended early-onset blindness.早期失明时间延长后出现的类别面孔知觉。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):6139-6143. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616050114. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Validation of the NIMH-ChEFS adolescent face stimulus set in an adolescent, parent, and health professional sample.在青少年、家长和健康专业人员样本中对美国国立精神卫生研究所-儿童及青少年情绪与功能筛查(NIMH-ChEFS)青少年面部刺激集进行验证。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2015 Dec;24(4):275-86. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1490. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
5
Extending the two faces of subjective randomness: From the gambler's and hot-hand fallacies toward a hierarchy of binary sequence perception.拓展主观随机性的两个方面:从赌徒谬误和热手谬误到二元序列感知层次结构
Mem Cognit. 2015 Oct;43(7):1056-70. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0523-5.
6
Infant perceptual development for faces and spoken words: an integrated approach.婴儿对面孔和口语单词的感知发展:一种综合方法。
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 Nov;56(7):1454-81. doi: 10.1002/dev.21243. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
7
How do babies know their friends and foes?婴儿是如何分辨朋友和敌人的?
Hum Nat. 1990 Dec;1(4):331-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02734050.
8
Autism and the development of face processing.自闭症与面部加工的发展
Clin Neurosci Res. 2006 Oct;6(3):145-160. doi: 10.1016/j.cnr.2006.08.001.