• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症联合委员会第七版与第八版口腔癌分期系统的比较。

Comparison of the seventh and eighth edition american joint committee on cancer oral cavity staging systems.

作者信息

Cramer John D, Reddy Abhita, Ferris Robert L, Duvvuri Umamaheswar, Samant Sandeep

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2018 Oct;128(10):2351-2360. doi: 10.1002/lary.27205. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1002/lary.27205
PMID:29658104
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

For the first time in 30 years, the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual offers major changes in the staging of oral cavity cancer. We evaluated the predictive ability of the new staging system for oral cavity cancer to validate these changes and hypothesized that the new system would improve prognostic accuracy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in the National Cancer Data Base from 2009 to 2013 and applied the seventh and eighth edition staging AJCC staging systems to all patients. Stage-specific overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and concordance indices to measure the system's prognostic accuracy.

RESULTS

We identified 39,361 patients with a median follow-up of 27.1 months (range 0.1-80.4 months). In the seventh edition, there were 43.0%, 15.0%, 10.6%, and 25.7% of patients with pathologic stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. After restaging based on eighth edition pathological guidelines, 10.0% of patients were upstaged (38.1%, 18.1%, 14.2%, and 25.2%, respectively, with stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively). The survival concordance index improved from the seventh to eighth edition for pathological staging (concordance index 0.699 and 0.704, respectively) and for clinical staging (concordance index 0.714 and 0.715, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We provide validation of the new AJCC staging system for oral cavity cancer. Eighth edition AJCC staging guidelines upstage a substantial number of patients with greater depth of invasion or extranodal extension. This resulted in slightly improved prognostication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c. Laryngoscope, 128:2351-2360, 2018.

摘要

目的

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期手册第八版在30年来首次对口腔癌分期做出了重大改变。我们评估了口腔癌新分期系统的预测能力,以验证这些改变,并假设新系统将提高预后准确性。

方法

我们对2009年至2013年国家癌症数据库中口腔鳞状细胞癌患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,并将第七版和第八版AJCC分期系统应用于所有患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算特定阶段的总生存率,并使用一致性指数来衡量系统的预后准确性。

结果

我们确定了39361例患者,中位随访时间为27.1个月(范围0.1 - 80.4个月)。在第七版中,病理分期为I、II、III和IV期疾病的患者分别占43.0%、15.0%、10.6%和25.7%。根据第八版病理指南重新分期后,10.0%的患者分期上调(I、II、III和IV期疾病的患者分别为38.1%、18.1%、14.2%和25.2%)。病理分期从第七版到第八版的生存一致性指数有所提高(一致性指数分别为0.699和0.704),临床分期也是如此(一致性指数分别为0.714和0.715)。

结论

我们对口腔癌新AJCC分期系统进行了验证。第八版AJCC分期指南使大量具有更深浸润深度或结外扩展的患者分期上调。这导致预后预测略有改善。

证据水平

2c。《喉镜》,2018年,第128卷,第2351 - 2360页。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the seventh and eighth edition american joint committee on cancer oral cavity staging systems.美国癌症联合委员会第七版与第八版口腔癌分期系统的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Oct;128(10):2351-2360. doi: 10.1002/lary.27205. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
2
Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions American Joint Committee Cancer classification system in oral cavity squamous cell cancers.第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会癌症分类系统在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的比较。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Jun 15;146(12):3379-3384. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32720. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Pathologic staging changes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Stage migration and implications for adjuvant treatment.口腔鳞状细胞癌的病理分期变化:分期迁移及其对辅助治疗的影响。
Cancer. 2019 Sep 1;125(17):2975-2983. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32161. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)TNM 分期系统在可切除胰腺癌患者中的国际验证。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):e183617. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3617. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
5
Prognostic implications of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的预后意义。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Oct;85:82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts.预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的生存情况:在两个当代国家患者队列中比较第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联合会分期系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1408-1416. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0306. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
Stage migration and treatment outcome in carcinoma tongue - A comparison of seventh and eighth AJCC pathological staging systems.舌癌的分期迁移和治疗结果——第七版和第八版 AJCC 病理分期系统的比较。
Indian J Cancer. 2022 Oct-Dec;59(4):584-590. doi: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_752_21.
8
Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging for Selected and Nonselected Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas.第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期在选择性和非选择性口咽鳞状细胞癌中的比较。
Oncologist. 2022 Feb 3;27(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab001.
9
AJCC 8th Edition oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma staging - Is it an improvement on the AJCC 7th Edition?第 8 版 AJCC 口腔鳞状细胞癌分期——优于第 7 版 AJCC 吗?
Oral Oncol. 2018 Jul;82:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 May 10.
10
Validation of the eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.美国癌症联合委员会第八版人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽癌分期系统的验证
Head Neck. 2018 Mar;40(3):457-466. doi: 10.1002/hed.24974. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
HAS1 cancer associated fibroblasts located at the tumor invasion front zone promote oral squamous cell carcinoma invasion via ECM remodeling.位于肿瘤侵袭前沿区域的HAS1癌相关成纤维细胞通过细胞外基质重塑促进口腔鳞状细胞癌的侵袭。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 14;44(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13046-025-03493-6.
2
The significance of the depth of invasion and tumor size in resected pathologic T4a gingivobuccal squamous cell carcinoma.切除的病理T4a牙龈颊部鳞状细胞癌中浸润深度和肿瘤大小的意义
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 26;15(1):14618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98222-6.
3
Impact of face masks on empathy and communication in head and neck cancer patients: a case-control study.
口罩对头颈部癌症患者共情与沟通的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 7;15:1539070. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1539070. eCollection 2025.
4
Prognostic Implications of the Number of Lymph Node Metastases in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Population Study of the SEER Database and an Institutional Registry.口腔舌鳞状细胞癌淋巴结转移数量的预后意义:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库及机构登记处的人群研究
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(24):e70493. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70493.
5
Has the 8th American joint committee on cancer TNM staging improved prognostic performance in oral cancer? A systematic review.第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会 TNM 分期系统是否改善了口腔癌的预后表现?一项系统评价。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Mar 1;29(2):e163-e171. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25983.
6
Comparison of the 7th and revised 8th UICC editions (2020) for oral squamous cell carcinoma: How does the reclassification impact staging and survival?第 7 版和修订后的第 8 版 UICC 口腔鳞状细胞癌分期系统比较(2020 年):重新分类如何影响分期和生存?
Virchows Arch. 2024 Jun;484(6):901-913. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03727-y. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
7
A preoperative nomogram model for the prediction of lymph node metastasis in buccal mucosa cancer.用于预测颊黏膜癌淋巴结转移的术前列线图模型。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14120-14129. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6076. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Current Insights and Progress in the Clinical Management of Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌临床管理的当前见解与进展
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 10;14(24):6079. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246079.
9
Clinical Value of Diffusion-Weighted Whole-Body Imaging with Background Body Signal Suppression (DWIBS) for Staging of Patients with Suspected Head and Neck Cancer.全身弥散加权背景抑制成像(DWIBS)在疑似头颈部癌症患者分期中的临床价值。
Tomography. 2022 Oct 9;8(5):2522-2532. doi: 10.3390/tomography8050210.
10
Comparison of Different Staging Systems Applied to a Cohort of Patients With Oral Tongue and Floor of the Mouth Cancer.应用于一组口腔舌癌和口底癌患者的不同分期系统的比较
Front Oral Health. 2021 Sep 23;2:737329. doi: 10.3389/froh.2021.737329. eCollection 2021.