Pirbaglou Meysam, Katz Joel, Motamed Mehras, Pludwinski Sarah, Walker Krista, Ritvo Paul
1 School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1613-1626. doi: 10.1177/0890117118758234. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
Personal health coaching (PHC) programs have become increasingly utilized as a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) self-management intervention strategy. This article evaluates the impact of PHC programs on glycemic management and related psychological outcomes.
Electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science).
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) published between January 1990 and September 2017 and focused on the effectiveness of PHC interventions in adults with T2DM.
Using prespecified format guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework.
Quantitative synthesis for primary (ie, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) and qualitative synthesis for selected psychological outcomes.
Meta-analyses of 22 selected publications showed PHC interventions favorably impact HbA1c levels in studies with follow-ups at ≤3 months (-0.32% [95% confidence interval, CI = -0.55 to -0.09%]), 4 to 6 months (-0.50% [95% CI = -0.65 to -0.35%], 7 to 9 months (-0.66% [95% CI = -1.04 to -0.28%]), and 12 to 18 months (-0.24% [95% CI = -0.38 to -0.10%]). Subsequent subgroup analyses led to no conclusive patterns, except for greater magnitude of effect size in studies with conventional (2-arm) RCT design.
The PHC appears effective in improving glycemic control. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of specific program components, training, and supervision approaches and to determine the cost-effectiveness of PHC interventions.
个人健康指导(PHC)项目已越来越多地被用作2型糖尿病(T2DM)自我管理的干预策略。本文评估了PHC项目对血糖管理及相关心理结果的影响。
电子数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE、PubMed、PsycINFO和Web of Science)。
1990年1月至2017年9月期间发表的随机对照试验(RCT),且侧重于PHC干预对成年T2DM患者的有效性。
采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)框架指导的预定格式。
对主要指标(即糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c])进行定量综合分析,对选定的心理结果进行定性综合分析。
对22篇选定出版物的Meta分析表明,PHC干预在随访时间≤3个月(-0.32%[95%置信区间,CI=-0.55至-0.09%])、4至6个月(-0.50%[95%CI=-0.65至-0.35%])、7至9个月(-0.66%[95%CI=-1.04至-0.28%])以及12至18个月(-0.24%[95%CI=-0.38至-0.10%])的研究中,对HbA1c水平有积极影响。随后的亚组分析未得出确凿模式,但传统(双臂)RCT设计的研究中效应量幅度更大。
PHC似乎对改善血糖控制有效。需要进一步研究以评估特定项目组成部分、培训和监督方法的有效性,并确定PHC干预的成本效益。