Goense Lucas, Meziani Jihane, Borggreve Alicia S, van Rossum Peter S, Meijer Gert J, Ruurda Jelle P, van Hillegersberg Richard, Weusten Bas L
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Minerva Chir. 2018 Aug;73(4):428-436. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07763-5. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
Esophagectomy combined with lymphadenectomy is currently recommended for patients with high-risk early-stage esophageal cancer after endoscopic treatment (i.e. submucosal tumor invasion [sm2-3], presence of lymphovascular invasion and/or poor tumor differentiation) given the high risk of lymph node metastases. Unfortunately, some patients do not have the physiologic capability to endure surgery. For these patients chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following endoscopic treatment could be an alternative. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment combined with CRT in patients with high-risk early-stage esophageal cancer.
A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting on the safety and efficacy of CRT following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with esophageal cancer invading the muscularis mucosae or submucosa. Primary outcomes were locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events.
Six studies were included, comprising a total of 168 patients with early-stage esophageal cancer that underwent endoscopic treatment followed by CRT. Most studies were retrospective case series and included small numbers of patients (11 to 66). All patients had T1a(m3) or T1b(sm1-3) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Adjuvant treatment consisted of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy; doses ranging from 40 to 60 Gy. The overall LRR rate ranged between 0-9%. Reported 3-year DFS and OS rates ranged between 69-100% and 87-100%, respectively. In all studies ESD and/or EMR was safely performed without serious complications. The observed CRT treatment-related toxicity (grade ≥3) ranged between 0% and 32%.
This review demonstrates that the current available literature lacks large prospective adequately powered studies and does not allow any firm conclusion regarding the role of endoscopic treatment combined with adjuvant CRT for patients with high-risk early-stage esophageal cancer.
鉴于淋巴结转移风险较高,目前建议对内镜治疗后处于高危早期食管癌患者(即黏膜下肿瘤浸润[sm2-3]、存在脉管浸润和/或肿瘤分化差)进行食管切除术联合淋巴结清扫术。不幸的是,一些患者没有承受手术的生理能力。对于这些患者,内镜治疗后进行放化疗(CRT)可能是一种替代方案。本系统评价的目的是评估内镜治疗联合CRT用于高危早期食管癌患者的安全性和有效性的证据。
进行了系统的文献检索,以确定关于食管癌侵犯黏膜肌层或黏膜下层患者在内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)或内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后进行CRT的安全性和有效性的研究报告。主要结局为局部区域复发(LRR)、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结局为治疗相关不良事件的发生情况。
纳入了6项研究,共168例接受内镜治疗后进行CRT的早期食管癌患者。大多数研究为回顾性病例系列,且患者数量较少(11至66例)。所有患者均患有T1a(m3)或T1b(sm1-3)食管鳞状细胞癌。辅助治疗包括顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶并同步放疗;剂量范围为40至60 Gy。总体LRR率在0%-9%之间。报告的3年DFS率和OS率分别在69%-100%和87%-100%之间。在所有研究中,ESD和/或EMR均安全实施,无严重并发症。观察到的CRT治疗相关毒性(≥3级)在0%至32%之间。
本综述表明,目前可得的文献缺乏大型前瞻性充分有力的研究,无法就内镜治疗联合辅助CRT对高危早期食管癌患者的作用得出任何确凿结论。