Yeager Valerie A, Wharton Mary Kristina, Monnette Alisha, Price-Haywood Eboni G, Nauman Elizabeth, Angove Rebekah S M, Shi Lizheng
1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health , Indianapolis, Indiana .
2 Department of Global Health Management and Policy, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine , New Orleans, Louisiana .
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Dec;21(6):454-461. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0196. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Diabetes and its comorbidities are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States and disproportionately in Louisiana. Chronic care management (CCM) efforts, such as care coordination models, are important initiatives in mitigating the impact of diabetes, such as poorer health outcomes and increased costs. This study examined one such effort, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' non-face-to-face CCM reimbursement program, for patients with diabetes and at least 1 other chronic condition in Louisiana. This qualitative study included interviews with patients in this program and health care providers and system leaders implementing the program. Results include lessons learned from health system leadership relating to CCM design and implementation, challenges experienced, overlapping initiatives, perceived benefits, performance, billing, and health information technology. Another key finding is that co-pays seem to be a barrier to patient interest in participation in non-face-to-face CCM, especially given that the value of the program is not completely clear to patients. A common strategy to address this co-pay barrier is to target dual eligibles, as Medicaid will cover the co-pay. However, widespread use of such strategies may indirectly exclude individuals who need and may also benefit from non-face-to-face CCM.
糖尿病及其合并症是美国发病和死亡的主要原因,在路易斯安那州的情况尤为严重。慢性护理管理(CCM)举措,如护理协调模式,是减轻糖尿病影响(如健康状况较差和成本增加)的重要举措。本研究考察了一项此类举措,即医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心针对路易斯安那州患有糖尿病且至少患有一种其他慢性病的患者实施的非面对面CCM报销计划。这项定性研究包括对该计划中的患者以及实施该计划的医疗服务提供者和系统领导者进行访谈。结果包括从卫生系统领导层吸取的有关CCM设计与实施、遇到的挑战、重叠举措、感知到的益处、绩效、计费以及健康信息技术方面的经验教训。另一个关键发现是,自付费用似乎是患者参与非面对面CCM的兴趣障碍,特别是考虑到该计划的价值对患者而言并不完全清晰。解决这一自付费用障碍的一个常见策略是将双重资格者作为目标人群,因为医疗补助将支付自付费用。然而,广泛使用此类策略可能会间接排除那些需要且可能也会从非面对面CCM中受益的个人。