Suppr超能文献

应用旋转血栓弹性描记术 5 分钟时的血凝块硬度(ROTEM EXTEM A5)预测创伤患者大量输血和院内死亡率:对 1146 例患者的回顾性分析。

Using rotational thromboelastometry clot firmness at 5 minutes (ROTEM EXTEM A5) to predict massive transfusion and in-hospital mortality in trauma: a retrospective analysis of 1146 patients.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Trauma Department, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2018 Sep;73(9):1103-1109. doi: 10.1111/anae.14297. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

Abstract

Viscoelastic assays such as TEG and ROTEM are increasingly used to guide transfusion of blood products. The EXTEM assay maximum clot firmness (MCF) is a ROTEM measure available after 25-29 min used to guide early decisions. EXTEM A10, the clot firmness at 10 min, is an accepted early surrogate, but investigators differ on whether A5, the clot firmness at 5 min, is acceptable. We re-examined this in a retrospective observational analysis of 1146 trauma patients in one centre who had ROTEM data recorded. A5 and A10 both correlated well with maximum clot firmness, with Pearson coefficients of r = 0.92 and r = 0.96, respectively. The correlations of A5, A10 and maximum clot firmness with requirement for massive transfusion were all similarly high, with c-stats of 0.87, 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. The correlations with mortality were also similar but weaker, with c-stats of 0.67, 0.69 and 0.69, respectively. Using a previously validated cut-off of A5 < 35 mm to predict massive transfusion gave a sensitivity of 95%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 9.3% and negative predictive value 100%. Using a value of A5 < 29 mm, for a pragmatic positive predictive value of 20%, gave a sensitivity of 67%, specificity 95% and negative predictive value 99%. Whether aiming for a high sensitivity or a strong predictive value, A5 was non-inferior to A10 and actually missed fewer cases needing massive transfusion. A5 has similar utility to both A10 and maximum clot firmness as an early measure of clot firmness, and a low A5 value is strongly predictive of the need for massive transfusion.

摘要

弹性检测试验(如 TEG 和 ROTEM)越来越多地用于指导血液制品的输注。EXTEM 试验的最大凝块硬度(MCF)是 ROTEM 在 25-29 分钟后可用的一种测量方法,用于指导早期决策。EXTEM A10 是 10 分钟时的凝块硬度,是一种公认的早期替代指标,但研究人员对于 5 分钟时的凝块硬度(A5)是否可接受存在分歧。我们在对一个中心的 1146 名创伤患者进行的回顾性观察性分析中重新检查了这一点,这些患者有 ROTEM 数据记录。A5 和 A10 均与最大凝块硬度高度相关,Pearson 系数分别为 r = 0.92 和 r = 0.96。A5、A10 和最大凝块硬度与大量输血需求的相关性也都非常高,c-统计量分别为 0.87、0.89 和 0.90。与死亡率的相关性也相似但较弱,c-统计量分别为 0.67、0.69 和 0.69。使用之前验证的 A5 < 35 mm 的截断值来预测大量输血,其敏感性为 95%,特异性为 83%,阳性预测值为 9.3%,阴性预测值为 100%。使用 A5 < 29 mm 的值,阳性预测值为 20%,其敏感性为 67%,特异性为 95%,阴性预测值为 99%。无论是追求高敏感性还是强预测值,A5 都不劣于 A10,实际上漏诊的需要大量输血的病例更少。A5 作为凝块硬度的早期测量指标,与 A10 和最大凝块硬度具有相似的效用,低 A5 值强烈预测需要大量输血。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4b6/6120456/698f8fde7706/ANAE-73-1103-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验