Suppr超能文献

对于重度先天性上睑下垂患者,额肌瓣与最大程度提上睑肌切除术作为首选治疗方法的比较

Frontalis Muscle Flap Versus Maximal Anterior Levator Resection as First Option for Patients With Severe Congenital Ptosis.

作者信息

Medel Ramón, Molina Salvador, Vasquez Luz Maria, Visa Josep, Wert Ana, Wolley-Dod Charlotte

机构信息

Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Department.

Pediatric Ophthalmology Department, Instituto de Microcirugia Ocular, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov/Dec;34(6):565-569. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001105.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare 2 surgical techniques (frontalis flap versus maximal anterior levator resection) as first surgical options for the treatment of congenital ptosis with poor levator function in patients younger than 2 years of age with a follow up of 10 years.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 58 patients (71 eyelids) with severe ptosis and poor levator function who underwent frontalis muscle flap (FMF = 47) or maximal anterior levator resection (ALR = 24) for correction of their ptosis. Eyelid measurements were taken at baseline, 1, 5, and 10 years after surgery. The presence of complications, need for reoperations, and palpebral contour were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most patients in both groups required only one surgical procedure with a stable average margin-reflex distance 1 over the 10-year follow-up period in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 techniques in achieving an adequate palpebral height after one single procedure. Eleven eyelids treated with FMF (23%) and 12 treated with ALR (50%) needed a reoperation, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 techniques. Five ALR patients (21%) and 6 FMF patients (13%) had alterations of eyelid contour. Pop-eyelid and eyelash ptosis were observed in 8% of patients operated with FMF.

CONCLUSION

Good functional and aesthetic results were obtained with both surgical techniques. FMF required fewer reoperations compared with maximal ALR, offering a better long-term result without residual ptosis.

摘要

目的

比较两种手术技术(额肌瓣术与最大提上睑肌切除术)作为2岁以下先天性上睑下垂且提上睑肌功能差患者的首次手术选择,并进行10年随访。

方法

对58例(71只眼睑)重度上睑下垂且提上睑肌功能差的患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受了额肌瓣术(FMF = 47)或最大提上睑肌切除术(ALR = 24)来矫正上睑下垂。在基线、术后1年、5年和10年进行眼睑测量。评估并发症的发生情况、再次手术的必要性和睑裂轮廓。

结果

两组中的大多数患者仅需进行一次手术,两组在10年随访期内平均边缘反射距离1均稳定,两种技术在单次手术后实现足够的睑裂高度方面无统计学显著差异。11只接受额肌瓣术治疗的眼睑(23%)和12只接受最大提上睑肌切除术治疗的眼睑(50%)需要再次手术,两种技术之间存在统计学显著差异。5例接受最大提上睑肌切除术的患者(21%)和6例接受额肌瓣术的患者(13%)出现睑裂轮廓改变。在接受额肌瓣术的患者中,8%观察到暴发性眼睑和睫毛下垂。

结论

两种手术技术均取得了良好的功能和美学效果。与最大提上睑肌切除术相比,额肌瓣术需要的再次手术较少,提供了更好的长期效果且无残余上睑下垂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验