• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持外周短导管通畅:急性护理环境中生理盐水封管与持续输注的比较。

Maintaining Short Peripheral Catheter Patency: A Comparison of Saline Lock Versus Continuous Infusion in the Acute Care Setting.

作者信息

Roszell Sheila Serr, Rabinovich Holly Barlowe, Smith-Miller Cheryl A

机构信息

University of North Carolina Healthcare System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Drs Roszell and Smith-Miller, and Ms Rabinovich). Sheila Serr Roszell, PhD, MSN, RN-BC, is the owner of Improvement Thinking Metrics, LLC, and is a quality data analyst for the University of North Carolina Healthcare System. She holds a BSN from the University of Missouri and an MSN and PhD in nursing, health care systems from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Holly Barlowe Rabinovich, BSN, RN, is a clinical nurse on an orthopedic trauma surgical unit at the University of North Carolina Healthcare System. She earned a BSN from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This project is her first foray into research. Cheryl A. Smith-Miller, PhD, RN-BC, is a nurse researcher at the University of North Carolina Healthcare System. She is currently serving as a nurse scientist, facilitating clinical nurses' engagement in research. Her research interests include nurses' work, culture, diabetes, and health disparities.

出版信息

J Infus Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;41(3):165-169. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000276.

DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000276
PMID:29659463
Abstract

Sparse evidence exists about how short peripheral catheter (SPC) duration is affected by the presence of a saline lock versus continually infusing fluids. Often the choice to lock an SPC with saline is based on provider preference, rather than available evidence or patient-centered factors. This study compared the duration of 85 SPCs: locked with saline versus continuously running fluids. A secondary analysis considered the influence of a number of intermittent medications and flushes. Although the saline-locked group had a slightly longer duration time, it was not statistically significant. Factors such as desire to ambulate or nighttime saline flushes merit consideration in SPC care decisions and standardized nurse-driven protocols.

摘要

关于与持续输液相比,生理盐水封管对短外周导管(SPC)留置时间的影响,现有证据稀少。通常,用生理盐水封管SPC的选择基于医护人员的偏好,而非现有证据或以患者为中心的因素。本研究比较了85根SPC的留置时间:生理盐水封管与持续输液。二次分析考虑了多种间歇性用药和冲管的影响。尽管生理盐水封管组的留置时间略长,但无统计学意义。在SPC护理决策和标准化的护士主导方案中,诸如活动意愿或夜间生理盐水冲管等因素值得考虑。

相似文献

1
Maintaining Short Peripheral Catheter Patency: A Comparison of Saline Lock Versus Continuous Infusion in the Acute Care Setting.维持外周短导管通畅:急性护理环境中生理盐水封管与持续输注的比较。
J Infus Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;41(3):165-169. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000276.
2
Continuous infusion versus intermittent flushing to prevent loss of function of peripheral intravenous catheters used for drug administration in newborn infants.持续输注与间歇性冲管预防新生儿静脉给药外周静脉导管功能丧失的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004593.pub2.
3
Efficacy of saline vs heparin in maintaining 24-gauge intermittent intravenous catheters in a rabbit model.在兔模型中生理盐水与肝素在维持24号间歇性静脉留置导管通畅方面的疗效比较
Neonatal Netw. 1999 Sep;18(6):49-54. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.18.6.49.
4
Normal saline flushes performed once daily maintain peripheral intravenous catheter patency: a randomised controlled trial.每日进行一次生理盐水冲洗可维持外周静脉导管通畅:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jul;100(7):700-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307478. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
5
Varied flushing frequency and volume to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial in adult medical-surgical hospital patients.采用不同的冲洗频率和量预防外周静脉导管失功:一项针对成年内科-外科住院患者的先导性析因随机对照试验
Trials. 2016 Jul 26;17(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1470-6.
6
The effects of heparin versus normal saline for maintenance of peripheral intravenous locks in pregnant women.肝素与生理盐水对维持孕妇外周静脉留置针通畅的效果比较
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):503-8. doi: 10.1177/0884217503255203.
7
Utilization of an elastomeric continuous infusion device to maintain catheter patency.使用弹性体连续输注装置维持导管通畅。
J Intraven Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(2):102-6.
8
Continuous infusion versus intermittent flushing: maintaining peripheral intravenous access in newborn infants.持续输注与间歇性冲洗:维持新生儿外周静脉通路
J Perinatol. 2016 Oct;36(10):870-3. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.94. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Effectiveness of heparin solution versus normal saline in maintaining patency of intravenous locks in neonates: a double blind randomized controlled study.肝素溶液与生理盐水在维持新生儿静脉锁通畅中的效果比较:一项双盲随机对照研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Dec;67(12):2677-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05718.x. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
10
Efficacy of normal saline in the maintenance of the arterial lines in comparison to heparin flush: a comprehensive review of the literature.与肝素封管相比,生理盐水在维持动脉留置导管通畅中的有效性:文献综述
J Vasc Access. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):123-7. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000183. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Heparin versus normal saline for the care of peripheral intravenous catheters in children: A meta-analysis.肝素与生理盐水在儿童外周静脉导管护理中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2045. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2045.
2
The flushing procedure in nursing practices: A cross-sectional study with Portuguese and Brazilian nurses.护理实践中的冲洗程序:一项针对葡萄牙和巴西护士的横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 8;6(8):e04579. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04579. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Randomized clinical trial analyzing maintenance of peripheral venous catheters in an internal medicine unit: Heparin vs. saline.
随机临床试验分析内科病房外周静脉留置导管的维持:肝素与生理盐水。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):e0226251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226251. eCollection 2020.
4
The effect of different flushing methods in a short peripheral catheter.不同冲管方法对短外周导管的影响
Acta Cir Bras. 2019 Oct 14;34(8):e201900804. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020190080000004. eCollection 2019.