ARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis and Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
J Exp Bot. 2018 May 25;69(12):3053-3068. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery129.
The high energy cost and apparently low plasticity of C4 photosynthesis compared with C3 photosynthesis may limit the productivity and distribution of C4 plants in low light (LL) environments. C4 photosynthesis evolved numerous times, but it remains unclear how different biochemical subtypes perform under LL. We grew eight C4 grasses belonging to three biochemical subtypes [NADP-malic enzyme (NADP-ME), NAD-malic enzyme (NAD-ME), and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEP-CK)] under shade (16% sunlight) or control (full sunlight) conditions and measured their photosynthetic characteristics at both low and high light. We show for the first time that LL (during measurement or growth) compromised the CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM) to a greater extent in NAD-ME than in PEP-CK or NADP-ME C4 grasses by virtue of a greater increase in carbon isotope discrimination (∆P) and bundle sheath CO2 leakiness (ϕ), and a greater reduction in photosynthetic quantum yield (Φmax). These responses were partly explained by changes in the ratios of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC)/initial Rubisco activity and dark respiration/photosynthesis (Rd/A). Shade induced a greater photosynthetic acclimation in NAD-ME than in NADP-ME and PEP-CK species due to a greater Rubisco deactivation. Shade also reduced plant dry mass to a greater extent in NAD-ME and PEP-CK relative to NADP-ME grasses. In conclusion, LL compromised the co-ordination of the C4 and C3 cycles and, hence, the efficiency of the CCM to a greater extent in NAD-ME than in PEP-CK species, while CCM efficiency was less impacted by LL in NADP-ME species. Consequently, NADP-ME species are more efficient at LL, which could explain their agronomic and ecological dominance relative to other C4 grasses.
与 C3 光合作用相比,C4 光合作用的高能量成本和明显低的可塑性可能限制了 C4 植物在低光 (LL) 环境中的生产力和分布。C4 光合作用多次进化,但不同生化亚型在 LL 下的表现仍不清楚。我们在遮荫(16%阳光)或对照(全阳光)条件下生长了属于三种生化亚型(NADP-苹果酸酶 (NADP-ME)、NAD-苹果酸酶 (NAD-ME) 和磷酸烯醇丙酮酸羧激酶 (PEP-CK))的八种 C4 禾本科植物,并在低光和高光下测量它们的光合作用特性。我们首次表明,与 PEP-CK 或 NADP-ME C4 禾本科植物相比,LL(在测量或生长期间)通过更大程度地增加碳同位素分馏 (∆P) 和束鞘 CO2 泄漏率 (ϕ),以及更大程度地降低光合量子产量 (Φmax),对 NAD-ME C4 禾本科植物的 CO2 浓缩机制 (CCM) 造成更大的损害。这些响应部分可以通过磷酸烯醇丙酮酸羧化酶 (PEPC)/初始 Rubisco 活性和暗呼吸/光合作用 (Rd/A) 的比值变化来解释。由于 Rubisco 失活,遮荫引起 NAD-ME 比 NADP-ME 和 PEP-CK 物种更大的光合作用适应。遮荫还导致 NAD-ME 和 PEP-CK 相对 NADP-ME 禾本科植物更大程度地降低植物干质量。总之,LL 对 C4 和 C3 循环的协调性造成了更大的破坏,因此,与 PEP-CK 物种相比,NADP-ME 物种的 CCM 效率受到更大的影响,而在 NADP-ME 物种中,LL 对 CCM 效率的影响较小。因此,NADP-ME 物种在 LL 下效率更高,这可以解释它们相对于其他 C4 禾本科植物在农艺和生态方面的优势。