Gencay M, Seffner A, Pabinger S, Gautier J, Gohl P, Weizenegger M, Neofytos D, Batrla R, Woeste A, Kim H S, Westergaard G, Reinsch C, Brill E, Thuy P T T, Hoang B H, Sonderup M, Spearman C W, Brancaccio G, Fasano M, Gaeta G B, Santantonio T, Kaminski W E
Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, MVZ Labor Dr. Limbach & Kollegen GbR, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Oct;25(10):1132-1138. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12915. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
An important requirement for a state-of-the-art hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening assay is reliable detection of mutated HBsAg. Currently, there is a striking shortage of data regarding the detection rates of in vivo HBsAg mutations for these clinically important assays. Therefore, we compared the detection rates of four commercial HBsAg screening assays using a global cohort of 1553 patients from four continents with known HBV genotypes. These samples, which represent the broadest spectrum of known and novel HBsAg major hydrophilic region (MHR) mutations to date, were analyzed for the presence of HBsAg using the Roche Elecsys HBsAg II Qualitative, Siemens ADVIA Centaur XP HBsAg II, Abbott Architect HBsAg Qualitative II and DiaSorin Liaison HBsAg Qualitative assays, respectively. Of the 1553 samples, 1391 samples could be sequenced; of these, 1013 (72.8%) carried at least one of the 345 currently known amino acid substitutions (distinct HBsAg mutation) in the HBsAg MHR. All 1553 patient samples were positive for HBsAg using the Elecsys HBsAg II Qual assay, with a sensitivity (95% confidence interval) of 99.94% (99.64%-100%), followed by the Abbott Architect 99.81% (99.44%-99.96%), Siemens ADVIA 99.81% (99.44%-99.96%) and DiaSorin Liaison 99.36% (98.82%-99.69%) assays, respectively. Our results indicate that the Elecsys HBsAg II Qual assay exhibits the highest sensitivity among the commercial HBsAg screening assays, and demonstrate that its capacity to detect HBV infection is not compromised by HBsAg MHR mutants.
对于先进的乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)筛查检测而言,一个重要要求是能够可靠检测出突变的HBsAg。目前,关于这些临床重要检测对体内HBsAg突变的检测率,数据极为匮乏。因此,我们使用来自四大洲的1553例已知HBV基因型患者的全球队列,比较了四种商用HBsAg筛查检测的检测率。这些样本代表了迄今为止已知和新型HBsAg主要亲水区(MHR)突变的最广泛谱系,分别使用罗氏Elecsys HBsAg II定性检测、西门子ADVIA Centaur XP HBsAg II检测、雅培Architect HBsAg定性II检测和索灵Liaison HBsAg定性检测分析HBsAg的存在情况。在1553个样本中,1391个样本能够进行测序;其中,1013个(72.8%)在HBsAg MHR中携带目前已知的345种氨基酸替代(不同的HBsAg突变)中的至少一种。使用Elecsys HBsAg II定性检测,所有1553例患者样本的HBsAg均呈阳性,灵敏度(95%置信区间)为99.94%(99.64%-100%),其次是雅培Architect检测为99.81%(99.44%-99.96%)、西门子ADVIA检测为99.81%(99.44%-99.96%)和索灵Liaison检测为99.36%(98.82%-99.69%)。我们的结果表明,Elecsys HBsAg II定性检测在商用HBsAg筛查检测中灵敏度最高,并证明其检测HBV感染的能力不会因HBsAg MHR突变体而受损。