School of Psychiatry, Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Rd., Randwick, Sydney NSW 2031, Australia.
School of Psychiatry, Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Rd., Randwick, Sydney NSW 2031, Australia.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jul;90:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising new treatment for major depression. While recent randomised, sham-controlled studies found tDCS to have antidepressant effects, it remains to be determined whether a tDCS treatment course may also enhance cognitive function independent of mood effects in depressed patients. This systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis examined cognitive outcomes from randomised, sham-controlled trials of tDCS treatment for major depression. Seven randomised, sham-controlled trials (n = 478 participants, 260 in active and 218 in sham) of tDCS for major depression were included. Results showed no cognitive enhancement after active tDCS compared to sham for the 12 cognitive outcomes investigated. Active relative to sham tDCS treatment was associated with reduced performance gains on a measure of processing speed (β = -0.33, 95% CI -0.58; -0.08, p = 0.011). Active tDCS treatment for depression did not show cognitive benefits independent of mood effects. Rather, tDCS treatment relative to sham stimulation for major depression may instead be associated with a reduced practice effect for processing speed.
经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 已成为治疗重度抑郁症的一种很有前途的新方法。虽然最近的随机、假刺激对照研究发现 tDCS 具有抗抑郁作用,但仍需确定 tDCS 治疗疗程是否也可以在不影响抑郁患者情绪的情况下增强认知功能。本系统评价和个体患者数据 (IPD) 荟萃分析检查了针对重度抑郁症的 tDCS 治疗的随机、假刺激对照试验的认知结果。纳入了 7 项针对重度抑郁症的 tDCS 随机、假刺激对照试验(n=478 名参与者,主动治疗组 260 名,假刺激组 218 名)。结果表明,与假刺激相比,主动 tDCS 治疗后 12 项认知结果均未显示出认知增强。主动 tDCS 治疗与处理速度(β= -0.33,95%置信区间 -0.58;-0.08,p=0.011)的测量值上的表现增益减少相关。主动 tDCS 治疗抑郁症并没有显示出独立于情绪影响的认知益处。相反,tDCS 治疗相对于重度抑郁症的假刺激刺激可能与处理速度的练习效应减少有关。