Suppr超能文献

当前中东呼吸综合征医疗方法的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical outcomes of current medical approaches for Middle East respiratory syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Alazhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).

出版信息

Rev Med Virol. 2018 May;28(3):e1977. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1977. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a respiratory disease caused by MERS coronavirus. Because of lack of vaccination, various studies investigated the therapeutic efficacy of antiviral drugs and supportive remedies. A systematic literature search from 10 databases was conducted and screened for relevant articles. Studies reporting information about the treatment of MERS coronavirus infection were extracted and analyzed. Despite receiving treatment with ribavirin plus IFN, the case fatality rate was as high as 71% in the IFN-treatment group and exactly the same in patients who received supportive treatment only. Having chronic renal disease, diabetes mellitus and hypertension increased the risk of mortality (P < .05), and chronic renal disease is the best parameter to predict the mortality. The mean of survival days from onset of illness to death was 46.6 (95% CI, 30.5-62.6) for the IFN group compared with 18.8 (95% CI, 10.3-27.4) for the supportive-only group (P = .001). Delay in starting treatment, older age group, and preexisting comorbidities are associated with worse outcomes. In conclusion, there is no difference between IFN treatment and supportive treatment for MERS patients in terms of mortality. However, ribavirin and IFN combination might have efficacious effects with timely administration and monitoring of adverse events. Large-scale prospective randomized studies are required to assess the role of antiviral drugs for the treatment of this high mortality infection.

摘要

中东呼吸综合征(MERS)是一种由 MERS 冠状病毒引起的呼吸道疾病。由于缺乏疫苗,各种研究都在调查抗病毒药物和支持性治疗的疗效。从 10 个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,并对相关文章进行了筛选。提取并分析了报告有关 MERS 冠状病毒感染治疗信息的研究。尽管接受了利巴韦林加 IFN 治疗,但 IFN 治疗组的病死率仍高达 71%,而仅接受支持性治疗的患者的病死率完全相同。患有慢性肾脏疾病、糖尿病和高血压会增加死亡风险(P<.05),而慢性肾脏疾病是预测死亡率的最佳参数。与仅接受支持性治疗的组(95%CI,10.3-27.4)相比,接受 IFN 治疗的组从发病到死亡的平均存活天数为 46.6(95%CI,30.5-62.6)(P=.001)。治疗开始时间延迟、年龄较大和合并症与预后较差有关。总之,在死亡率方面,IFN 治疗与 MERS 患者的支持性治疗没有差异。但是,利巴韦林和 IFN 联合治疗可能具有有效的作用,需要及时进行不良反应监测。需要进行大规模的前瞻性随机研究来评估抗病毒药物在治疗这种高死亡率感染中的作用。

相似文献

3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19.Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):CD015209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015209.
7
SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19.用于治疗 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 中和单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.
8
Treatment for hepatitis C virus-associated mixed cryoglobulinaemia.丙型肝炎病毒相关混合性冷球蛋白血症的治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 7;5(5):CD011403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011403.pub2.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing the power of IFN for therapeutic approaches to COVID-19.利用 IFN 的力量寻求 COVID-19 的治疗方法。
J Virol. 2024 May 14;98(5):e0120423. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01204-23. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
7
Animal models for COVID-19: advances, gaps and perspectives.用于 COVID-19 的动物模型:进展、差距与展望。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022 Jul 7;7(1):220. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01087-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-dengue acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: A case report and meta-analysis.登革热后急性播散性脑脊髓炎:一例报告及荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jun 30;11(6):e0005715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005715. eCollection 2017 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验