Suppr超能文献

向《骨与关节外科杂志》披露利益冲突:行业报告薪酬的相关性。

Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: The Relevance of Industry-Reported Payments.

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 18;100(8):e51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00492.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic journals such as The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) require disclosures of financial relationships that authors report as potential conflicts of interest. Because industry payments can take various forms, including food and beverage, consulting, or research payments, the purpose of this study was to determine which categories of industry-reported payments were most frequently considered by authors as irrelevant to their specific publication, and therefore not included in their journal disclosures.

METHODS

Author disclosures were collected from scientific articles published in JBJS in 2016. Payments reported by authors as relevant to the published article were compared with industry-reported payments from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database (OPD), which includes all payments to eligible physicians in the United States. The number of authors with payments found in the OPD and appearing in publication-specific disclosures was determined for each payment type. Of note, OPD data are not indicative of relevance to a particular publication; therefore, the accuracy of author disclosures could not be determined in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 747 eligible authors were included; 60.5% of authors did not report at least 1 payment from their OPD report in their publication-specific disclosures, most frequently representing industry payments for food and beverage (55.7%), followed by travel and lodging (26.9%). Payments for consulting (16.3%), royalties (8.2%), research (8.4%), and ownership interests (1.5%) were not considered to be relevant disclosures for specific journal articles by authors at lower rates than those for food and beverage and for travel and lodging.

CONCLUSIONS

Authors publishing in JBJS were more likely to conclude that industry-reported payments in the OPD for food and beverage and for travel and lodging were irrelevant for specific publications (as disclosed to the journal) than payments for consulting, royalties, research, and ownership interests.

摘要

背景

学术期刊,如《骨科与关节外科杂志》(JBJS)要求作者披露其认为与特定出版物无关的财务关系,作为潜在的利益冲突。由于行业支付的形式多种多样,包括餐饮、咨询或研究付款,因此本研究旨在确定作者认为最无关的行业报告支付类别,并且因此未包含在其期刊披露中。

方法

从 2016 年在 JBJS 上发表的科学文章中收集作者披露信息。将作者报告的与已发表文章相关的款项与美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心开放支付数据库(OPD)中报告的行业支付进行比较,该数据库包括美国所有符合条件的医生的所有支付。对于每种支付类型,确定在 OPD 中发现并出现在特定出版物披露中的作者人数。值得注意的是,OPD 数据并不能说明与特定出版物的相关性;因此,本研究无法确定作者披露的准确性。

结果

共纳入 747 名合格作者;60.5%的作者未在其出版物特定披露中报告至少 1 笔来自 OPD 的报告,最常见的是餐饮行业支付(55.7%),其次是差旅和住宿(26.9%)。咨询(16.3%)、版税(8.2%)、研究(8.4%)和所有权权益(1.5%)的支付被作者认为与特定期刊文章的相关披露不如餐饮和差旅支付相关。

结论

在 JBJS 上发表文章的作者更有可能认为 OPD 中报告的餐饮和差旅行业支付与特定出版物(向期刊披露)无关,而不是咨询、版税、研究和所有权权益的支付。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验