Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM (CEW); Department of Psychology, Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse & Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (JST); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (MPB); Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (JC, RB); Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (TS).
J Addict Med. 2018 Sep/Oct;12(5):339-345. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000413.
The noradrenergic system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Medications in this class may reduce drinking. Our aims were to investigate this in a unique sample of individuals with AUD.
Thirty-six individuals with AUD were randomized to treatment with prazosin, an alpha-1 noradrenergic antagonist, or placebo, for 6 weeks (target daily dose 16 mg). Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the effect of treatment group on rate of change in primary (drinks per week [DPW]) and several secondary outcome measures.
Prazosin did not significantly affect rate of reduction in alcohol use in the intent to treat sample (n = 36) compared with placebo, but did significantly increase the rate of reduction in DPW in an optimal treatment exposure subgroup (beta = -0.3; P = 0.01; event rate ratio 0.74; confidence interval 0.59, 0.93; n = 27). Poor adherence and tolerability may have contributed to null effects. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) moderated the effects of treatment group on rate of reduction in drinks per drinking day, supporting previous work in doxazosin, another alpha-1 antagonist. Specifically, prazosin was associated with greater rates of reduction in drinking compared with placebo in individuals with high but not low DBP.
Our findings do not support the clinical utility of prazosin for all treatment-seeking AUD, but post hoc analyses indicate that it might have some efficacy in individuals who can tolerate it. Further work exploring the clinical utility of DBP as a treatment matching variable, and defining optimal values using sensitivity and specificity analyses, is warranted.
去甲肾上腺素能系统在酒精使用障碍(AUD)的病理生理学中起着重要作用。该类药物可能会减少饮酒。我们的目的是在一个独特的 AUD 患者样本中研究这一点。
36 名 AUD 患者被随机分为普萘洛尔组(一种 alpha-1 去甲肾上腺素拮抗剂)或安慰剂组,治疗 6 周(目标日剂量 16mg)。分层线性模型用于检查治疗组对主要(每周饮酒量[DPW])和几个次要结局测量的变化率的影响。
与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔在意向治疗样本(n=36)中并未显著影响酒精使用减少的速度,但在最佳治疗暴露亚组中显著增加了 DPW 的减少速度(β=-0.3;P=0.01;事件率比 0.74;置信区间 0.59,0.93;n=27)。依从性差和耐受性差可能导致了无效的结果。舒张压(DBP)调节了治疗组对每天饮酒量减少速度的影响,支持了多沙唑嗪(另一种 alpha-1 拮抗剂)的先前工作。具体而言,与安慰剂相比,在 DBP 较高但不是较低的个体中,普萘洛尔与较高的饮酒减少率相关。
我们的研究结果不支持普萘洛尔对所有寻求治疗的 AUD 的临床实用性,但事后分析表明,对于能够耐受的个体,它可能具有一定的疗效。进一步探索 DBP 作为治疗匹配变量的临床实用性,并使用灵敏度和特异性分析定义最佳值,是必要的。