Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 17;13(4):e0195818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195818. eCollection 2018.
Current measures of social cognition have shown inconsistent findings regarding the effects of healthy aging. Moreover, no tests are currently available that allow clinicians and researchers to examine cognitive and affective theory of mind (ToM) and understanding of social norms within the same test. To address these limitations, we present the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT) which assesses cognitive and affective ToM and inter- and intrapersonal understanding of social norms. We examined the effects of age, measures of intelligence and the Broader Autism Phenotype (BAP) on the ESCoT and established tests of social cognition. Additionally, we investigated the convergent validity of the ESCoT based on traditional social cognition measures. The ESCoT was administered alongside Reading the Mind in Films (RMF), Reading the Mind in Eyes (RME), Judgement of Preference and Social Norm Questionnaire to 91 participants (30 aged 18-35 years, 30 aged 45-60 years and 31 aged 65-85 years). Poorer performance on the cognitive and affective ToM ESCoT subtests were predicted by increasing age. The affective ToM ESCoT subtest and RMF were predicted by gender, where being female predicted better performance. Unlike the ESCoT, better performance on the RMF was predicted by higher verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning abilities, while better performance on the RME was predicted by higher verbal comprehension scores. Lower scores on inter-and intrapersonal understanding of social norms were both predicted by the presence of more autism-like traits while poorer interpersonal understanding of social norms performance was predicted by increasing age. These findings show that the ESCoT is a useful measure of social cognition and, unlike established tests of social cognition, performance is not predicted by measures of verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning. This is particularly valuable to obtain an accurate assessment of the influence of age on our social cognitive abilities.
目前的社会认知测量方法在健康老龄化对社会认知的影响方面得出的结果不一致。此外,目前还没有测试可以让临床医生和研究人员在同一个测试中检查认知和情感心理理论(ToM)以及对社会规范的理解。为了解决这些限制,我们提出了爱丁堡社会认知测试(ESCoT),该测试评估认知和情感 ToM 以及对社会规范的人际间和个体间理解。我们研究了年龄、智力测量和广泛自闭症表型(BAP)对 ESCoT 和既定社会认知测试的影响。此外,我们根据传统的社会认知测量方法调查了 ESCoT 的收敛有效性。ESCoT 与电影读心术(RMF)、眼睛读心术(RME)、偏好判断和社会规范问卷一起在 91 名参与者(18-35 岁 30 名,45-60 岁 30 名,65-85 岁 31 名)中进行了测试。认知和情感 ToM ESCoT 子测试的表现随着年龄的增长而下降。女性预测情感 ToM ESCoT 子测试和 RMF 的表现更好。与 ESCoT 不同,RMF 的表现更好预测了更高的言语理解和知觉推理能力,而 RME 的表现更好预测了更高的言语理解分数。人际间和个体间对社会规范的理解得分较低都与存在更多类自闭症特征有关,而较差的人际间社会规范理解表现则随着年龄的增长而下降。这些发现表明 ESCoT 是一种有用的社会认知测量方法,与既定的社会认知测试不同,其表现不受言语理解和知觉推理测量的预测。这对于准确评估年龄对我们社会认知能力的影响特别有价值。