• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险受益人中用于治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗注射频率

Frequency of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema in Medicare Beneficiaries.

作者信息

Wu Connie M, Wu Annie M, Greenberg Paul B, Yu Fei, Lum Flora, Coleman Anne L

出版信息

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Apr 1;49(4):241-244. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180329-05.

DOI:10.3928/23258160-20180329-05
PMID:29664980
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and variation of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) and ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) use for diabetic macular edema (DME) in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors obtained a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries from the Medicare Part B claims files from 2010 to 2013 and identified beneficiaries with DME using the ICD-9-CM code (362.07). Geographic variation was examined by comparing injection frequencies of bevacizumab and ranibizumab across U.S. census divisions using Chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS

The sample included 5,290 Medicare beneficiaries with DME. Overall, there was greater bevacizumab use (86.4%) compared to ranibizumab use (13.6%). Frequency of bevacizumab use was highest in the Mountain division (92.2%) and lowest in the Mid-Atlantic (76.0%). The total number of bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections for DME varied significantly between U.S. census divisions (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab is used more frequently than ranibizumab for the treatment of DME among Medicare beneficiaries, with significant geographic variation. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:241-244.].

摘要

背景与目的

描述美国玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(阿瓦斯汀;基因泰克公司,加利福尼亚州南旧金山)和雷珠单抗(兰尼单抗;基因泰克公司,加利福尼亚州南旧金山)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的频率及差异。

患者与方法

作者从2010年至2013年医疗保险B部分理赔档案中获取了5%的医疗保险受益人的样本,并使用ICD-9-CM编码(362.07)识别出患有DME的受益人。通过使用卡方分析比较美国各人口普查分区贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗的注射频率来研究地理差异。

结果

该样本包括5290名患有DME的医疗保险受益人。总体而言,与雷珠单抗的使用(13.6%)相比,贝伐单抗的使用更为广泛(86.4%)。贝伐单抗的使用频率在山区最高(92.2%),在大西洋中部最低(76.0%)。美国各人口普查分区用于DME的贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗注射总数存在显著差异(P <.0001)。

结论

在医疗保险受益人中,贝伐单抗用于治疗DME的频率高于雷珠单抗,且存在显著的地理差异。[《眼科手术、激光与视网膜成像》。2018;49:241 - 244。]

相似文献

1
Frequency of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema in Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人中用于治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗注射频率
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Apr 1;49(4):241-244. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180329-05.
2
Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema in Eyes Previously Treated With Ranibizumab and/or Bevacizumab May Further Improve Macular Thickness.阿柏西普用于曾接受雷珠单抗和/或贝伐单抗治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿眼,可能会进一步改善黄斑厚度。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016 Sep 1;47(9):836-9. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20160901-06.
3
Short-Term Effects of Early Switching to Ranibizumab or Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema Cases With Non-Response to Bevacizumab.在对贝伐单抗无反应的糖尿病性黄斑水肿病例中早期改用雷珠单抗或阿柏西普的短期效果
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Mar 1;48(3):230-236. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170301-06.
4
CHANGES IN PLASMA VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR LEVEL AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF BEVACIZUMAB, AFLIBERCEPT, OR RANIBIZUMAB FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.玻璃体腔内注射贝伐单抗、阿柏西普或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿后血浆血管内皮生长因子水平的变化。
Retina. 2018 Sep;38(9):1801-1808. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002004.
5
COMPLIANCE AND ADHERENCE OF PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA TO INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY IN DAILY PRACTICE.糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者在日常实践中接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的依从性和顺应性。
Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2293-2300. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001892.
6
Comparison of Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusions in Routine Clinical Practice.雷珠单抗与贝伐单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的常规临床实践比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Jun 1;48(6):465-472. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170601-04.
7
Comparing the Efficacy of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (BRDME): The BRDME Study, a Randomized Trial.比较贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的疗效(BRDME):BRDME研究,一项随机试验。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Aug;4(8):777-788. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Quantitative assessment of macular contraction and vitreoretinal interface alterations in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿时黄斑收缩及玻璃体视网膜界面改变的定量评估
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;256(10):1801-1806. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4042-5. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
9
A Crossover Design for Comparative Efficacy: A 36-Week Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema.一种用于比较疗效的交叉设计:贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的36周随机试验。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):841-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.021. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
10
The Interval between Treatments of Bevacizumab and Dexamethasone Implants for Diabetic Macular Edema Increased over Time in the BEVORDEX Trial.在BEVORDEX试验中,贝伐单抗与地塞米松植入物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的间隔时间随时间增加。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Mar;2(3):231-234. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema and Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy Among Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries.医疗保险B部分按服务收费受益人群中糖尿病性黄斑水肿和威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的患病率及治疗趋势
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 1;140(4):345-353. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0052.
2
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Vision Outcomes with Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema.雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的真实世界治疗模式及视力结果
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;2021:8825082. doi: 10.1155/2021/8825082. eCollection 2021.
3
Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema.
糖尿病性黄斑水肿初始治疗选择的决定因素
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jan;4(1):41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 25.
4
Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management.糖尿病性黄斑水肿:循证管理。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;66(12):1736-1750. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1240_18.