• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病性黄斑水肿初始治疗选择的决定因素

Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema.

作者信息

VanderBeek Brian L, Scavelli Kurt, Yu Yinxi

机构信息

Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jan;4(1):41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2019.05.016
PMID:31345726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6875609/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess how patient choices (out-of-pocket costs, insurance plan, geographic region) impact initiation of therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using administrative medical claims data from a large, national insurer.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients newly diagnosed with DME from 2013 through 2016 were observed for 90 days after diagnosis or until first treatment was received.

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression was used to create odds ratios comparing different baseline demographic and patient-related factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the odds of receiving the different possible initial treatments for DME (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], focal laser treatment, steroids, or observation), no treatment, and not following up.

RESULTS

Of the 6220 newly diagnosed DME patients, 3010 (48.4%) underwent a follow-up examination within 90 days of diagnosis, and of those, 1453 patients (48.3%) received treatment in the observation window, including 614 (20.4%) with bevacizumab, 191 (6.3%) with ranibizumab or aflibercept, 560 (18.6%) with focal laser, 38 (1.3%) with steroid injection, and 50 (1.7%) with an injection of an unspecified drug. Having a copay (vs. $0) lowered the odds of receiving any treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.71; P < 0.001) and of receiving each treatment individually (anti-VEGF treatment: OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; bevacizumab: OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91; ranibizumab or aflibercept: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99; focal laser: OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.55; P < 0.001). Contrary to having a copay, having a high deductible and type of insurance plan were not associated with initiating treatment (P > 0.41 for all comparisons). Patients in the Northeast showed lower odds of initiating anti-VEGF treatment (OR = 0.60; 95%CI, 0.44-0.82; P < 0.001) and specifically bevacizumab (OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P < 0.001). Furthermore, Northeast patients who were treated with anti-VEGF showed a higher odds of receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept compared with bevacizumab (OR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.31-4.37; P < 0.001). Southern Midwest patients showed a higher odds of treatment (anti-VEGF: OR = 1.35; 95%CI, 1.02-1.77; P < 0.001; bevacizumab: OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87; focal laser: OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.89; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient choices such as copays and where they live are important factors in determining the initial choice of treatment for DME.

摘要

目的

评估患者的选择(自付费用、保险计划、地理区域)如何影响糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)治疗的起始。

设计

使用来自一家大型全国性保险公司的行政医疗理赔数据进行回顾性队列研究。

参与者

2013年至2016年新诊断为DME的所有患者在诊断后观察90天或直至接受首次治疗。

方法

使用多变量逻辑回归来创建比值比,以比较不同的基线人口统计学和患者相关因素。

主要结局指标

主要结局是接受DME不同可能初始治疗(抗血管内皮生长因子[VEGF]、局部激光治疗、类固醇或观察)、未治疗和未随访的几率。

结果

在6220例新诊断的DME患者中,3010例(48.4%)在诊断后90天内接受了随访检查,其中1453例患者(48.3%)在观察期内接受了治疗,包括614例(20.4%)接受贝伐单抗治疗、191例(6.3%)接受雷珠单抗或阿柏西普治疗、560例(18.6%)接受局部激光治疗、38例(1.3%)接受类固醇注射以及50例(1.7%)接受未指明药物注射。有自付费用(相对于0美元)降低了接受任何治疗的几率(比值比[OR]=0.60;95%置信区间[CI],0.51 - 0.71;P<0.001)以及单独接受每种治疗的几率(抗VEGF治疗:OR = 0.72;95%CI,0.59 - 0.88;贝伐单抗:OR = 0.73;95%CI,0.59 - 0.91;雷珠单抗或阿柏西普:OR,0.70;95%CI,0.49 - 0.99;局部激光:OR = 0.44;95%CI,0.35 - 0.55;P<0.001)。与有自付费用相反,高免赔额和保险计划类型与开始治疗无关(所有比较的P>0.41)。东北部的患者开始抗VEGF治疗的几率较低(OR = 0.60;95%CI,0.44 - 0.82;P<0.001),特别是贝伐单抗(OR = 0.47;95%CI,0.33 - 0.67;P<0.001)。此外,接受抗VEGF治疗的东北部患者接受雷珠单抗或阿柏西普的几率高于贝伐单抗(OR = 2.39;95%CI,1.31 - 4.37;P<0.001)。中西部南部的患者治疗几率较高(抗VEGF:OR = 1.35;95%CI,1.02 - 1.77;P<0.001;贝伐单抗:OR = 1.40;95%CI,1.04 - 1.87;局部激光:OR = 1.39;95%CI,1.01 - 1.89;P<0.001)。

结论

患者的选择,如自付费用和居住地点,是决定DME初始治疗选择的重要因素。

相似文献

1
Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿初始治疗选择的决定因素
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jan;4(1):41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 25.
2
Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项比较疗效随机临床试验的两年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
3
Five-Year Outcomes after Initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T Extension Study).初始阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的 5 年结果(协议 T 扩展研究)。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
4
Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗伴有视力损害的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿后持续性黄斑增厚:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565.
5
Real-world management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema in Japan: two-year visual outcomes with and without anti-VEGF therapy in the STREAT-DME study.日本治疗初发糖尿病性黄斑水肿的真实世界管理:STREAT-DME 研究中有无抗 VEGF 治疗的两年视觉结局。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;104(9):1209-1215. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315199. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Comparison of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Extrapolation of Data to Clinical Practice.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较:数据外推至临床实践
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):95-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4110.
7
Assessment of the DRCR Retina Network Approach to Management With Initial Observation for Eyes With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Visual Acuity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.DRCR 视网膜网络初始观察方法治疗中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿和良好视力眼的评估:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;138(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.6035.
8
Conversion to Aflibercept After Prior Anti-VEGF Therapy for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema.既往抗血管内皮生长因子治疗持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿后改用阿柏西普治疗
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:118-27.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.030. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
9
Recent clinically relevant highlights from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络近期的临床相关要点。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 May;29(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000472.
10
Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema: recent clinically relevant findings from DRCR.net Protocol T.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:DRCR.net方案T的近期临床相关研究结果
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;28(6):636-643. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000424.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Outcomes of Different Types of Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema Before and After Approval of Anti-Vascular Endothelium Growth Factor Agents.抗血管内皮生长因子药物获批前后糖尿病性黄斑水肿不同治疗类型的真实世界结局
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 2;13(23):7336. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237336.
2
Social Determinants of Health and Impact on Screening, Prevalence, and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy in Adults: A Narrative Review.成人糖尿病视网膜病变筛查、患病率及管理中的健康社会决定因素:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7120. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237120.
3
Cost-sharing and adherence, clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and costs: A systematic literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Yearly Treatment Patterns for Patients with Recently Diagnosed Diabetic Macular Edema.新诊断糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的年度治疗模式
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Apr;3(4):362-370. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
2
Rewarding Cost Efficiency in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.在医疗保险基于绩效的激励支付系统中奖励成本效益。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):189-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.025.
3
Frequency of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema in Medicare Beneficiaries.
费用分担与依从性、临床结局、医疗保健利用和成本:系统文献回顾。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jan;29(1):4-16. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21270. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
An Introduction to Biosimilars for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: A Narrative Review.用于治疗视网膜疾病的生物类似药介绍:一篇叙述性综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):959-982. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00488-w. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Autonomous Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Screening for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes.自主即时糖尿病视网膜病变筛查在儿童糖尿病患者中的成本效益分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 1;138(10):1063-1069. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3190.
医疗保险受益人中用于治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗注射频率
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Apr 1;49(4):241-244. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180329-05.
4
Geographic and Demographic Variation in Use of Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration in the United States.美国雷珠单抗与贝伐单抗用于治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的地理和人口统计学差异
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;184:157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
Accuracy of Billing Codes Used in the Therapeutic Care of Diabetic Retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变治疗护理中使用的计费代码的准确性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 1;135(7):791-794. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1595.
6
High Variation of Intravitreal Injection Rates and Medicare Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Payments per Injection in the United States.美国玻璃体内注射率和医疗保险每注射一次抗血管内皮生长因子支付费用的高度变化。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
7
Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的治疗趋势:一项全国性队列研究分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149450. eCollection 2016.
8
Geographic Variation in the Rate and Timing of Cataract Surgery Among US Communities.美国不同社区白内障手术率及手术时机的地理差异。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;134(3):267-76. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5322.
9
Geographic Variation in the Use of Diagnostic Testing of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Open-Angle Glaucoma.新诊断开角型青光眼患者诊断性检查使用情况的地域差异
Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):522-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
10
Clinical utilization of anti-vascular endothelial growth-factor agents and patient monitoring in retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema.抗血管内皮生长因子药物在视网膜静脉阻塞和糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的临床应用及患者监测
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug 26;8:1611-21. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S60893. eCollection 2014.